Chinese to English: Electronic/ IT | |
Source text - Chinese
我们的日常工作用到的windows系统比较频繁,现在电脑的性能基本上都比较强大,处理器和显卡都应该可以胜任大型软件的运行,不知道Geoframe软件的发展能否考虑应用到此系统中来!
再则就是提高软件界面的人性化程度,让人机互动的效果更显著一点!
Geoframe是个综合地质、测井和地震研究的软件,非常强大。只可惜我们的应用还只局限于某单一方面,譬如只用此软件来进行构造解释任务,地震属性提取。我想这可能也是长期的设备条件落后造成的一定制约,这当然跟企业的制度和体系有某种程度的关联。但是从另一个方面来说,是不是你们企业的推广方面的功课做得不是很足呢。
| Translation - English
Windows system has been used quite frequently in our daily lives. Now that our computer’s performance basically is getting more powerful, both processor and graphic card should be capable of running large-scale softwares. Yet it is still yet to know if we could consider Geoframe software’s development to be applied into this system.
Moreover, it is to improve the software’s human-traits degree so that the effect of human-machine interaction is more significant.
Geoframe is a very powerful software that integrates geological, well logging and seismic researches. Unfortunately, by now our application has been only limited to one single aspect, for example, only to use this software to perform structural explanatory tasks and to collect seismic attribute. I believe long period of lag-behind equipment may cause this constraint. Of course it has, to certain degree, its correlation with enterprise system and regulation. But from another perspective, I wonder if the enterprise has performed its task hard enough in promotion department?
|
Chinese to English: Medical Field | |
Source text - Chinese 医学
术后患者均获随访13~30个月,平均15个月。三组手术时间、术中出血量及术前椎间隙高度比较,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。最后随访时,A、B及C组临床疗效评估优良率分别为81.0%、80.6%及83.3%,差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);术后1年,椎间融合率分别为81.0%、83.3%及97%,A、B组及C组间差异有统计学意义(p | Translation - English MEDICINE
Post-operative patients have been followed for 13-30 months with average of 15 months. Three groups of length of operation , peri-operative bleeding volume, and pre-operative vertebra disc gap height do not show significant difference statistically (p>0.05). On the last follow-up, the assessment of clinical treatment effectiveness for group A, B, and C are 81.0%, 80.6%, and 83.3%, the difference is not significant statistically(p>0.05); After one year, vertebra disc gap fusion rate are 81%, 83.3% and 97%. The difference of fusion rate in group A and B compared with that in group C has significance meaning statistically (p |