Glossary entry

French term or phrase:

un vice de fond

English translation:

a procedural error

Added to glossary by Julie Barber
Mar 27, 2016 16:44
8 yrs ago
10 viewers *
French term

un vice de fond

French to English Law/Patents Law (general) court pleadings
Sixième moyen d’appel :

Encore une violation du principe du contradictoire alors que les juges arbitres ont balayé d’un revers de la main l’objection de A comme quoi ce n’était pas à elle d’assumer la responsabilité des faits allégués, mais à la filiale B qui bien que filiale avait juridiquement une totale indépendance fonctionnelle et décisionnelle.

En l’espèce il s’agit de la quantification du prétendu préjudice de C.

Le respect du contradictoire est un vice de forme et non pas **un vice de fond**, n’en déplaise à C.

Context: company A (also parent company to B) is appealing against an arbitration award to C

I found it in a dictionary as a "fundamental error" but couldn't quite under the sentence in the context. Thanks
Proposed translations (English)
4 +1 a fundamental error
4 +3 a substantive defect

Proposed translations

+1
37 mins
Selected

a fundamental error

or a fundamental flaw

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 38 mins (2016-03-27 17:23:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Les exceptions de nullité pour vice de forme ou de fond ...
www.cours-de-droit.net/les-exceptions-de-nullite-pour...
Translate this page
10 Oct 2015 - Un vice de forme est l'absence ou la présence erronée de mentions et d'éléments devant figurer sur un acte de procédure. Le défendeur doit ...
Note from asker:
Thanks. So it makes sense to say that "compliance with the adversarial principle is a technicality and not a fundamental flaw"?
Peer comment(s):

agree philgoddard : Or substantive/essential defect https://books.google.com/books?id=rQAKtn-XjzIC&pg=PA309&lpg=...
11 mins
agree Ben Gaia : I also agree with this translation.
3 hrs
disagree Daryo : your link is dead + "fundamental error" is not a legal term/concept, it sounds more like an explanation to be found in "Law for Dummies" + committing a "vice de forme" could also end up being a "fundamental error" enough to annul the decision ...
17 hrs
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "thanks"
+3
48 mins

a substantive defect

- namely one of substantive law vs. a vice de forme, namely a procedural flaw.

FHS Bridge's FR/EN gloassary: essential or substantive defect.

IATE's EU website entry making a hopeless mix-up of metaphors:


LAW [EP] Full entry
FR

procédure entachée d'un vice de fond

EN

fundamental error in procedure

Note from asker:
thanks for your help
Peer comment(s):

agree Peter LEGUIE
19 mins
Merci and thanks!
agree Ben Gaia : I like "a procedural error rather than a fundamental one". The difficult part is in translating "le respect" which, if the procedure has NOT been respected, could be rendered as "Lack of compliance". ...(to reply) yes "disregard" is good
1 hr
Thanks, but could be the wrong way round. It's fundamental/substantive vs. procedural in form. Also, Le respect du contradictoire > heeding = as you intimate: (non-)heeding = disregard of the adversarial principle.
agree Daryo
17 hrs
neutral philgoddard : Your reference says "fundamental error"!
18 hrs
Take another look: IATE's EU website entry making a *hopeless mix-up of metaphors*
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

18 hrs
Reference:

defects: substantive vs procedural

...
Defects in summary-judgment affidavits come in two flavors: substantive and procedural. Substantive objections can be raised for the first time on appeal. Procedural objections must be raised in the trial court or they are waived. One way to think about the difference between substantive and procedural objections is that procedural objections relate to the admissibility of the evidence and substantive objections relate to competence of the evidence. Another way to think about the difference is that procedural defects are those that could be corrected if pointed out, but substantive defects could not be. But courts of appeals have not always agreed about which defects are procedural and which are substantive.
...
http://texasappellatewatch.typepad.com/texas-appellate-watch...
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search