Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
lié par les faits repris
English translation:
bound by the findings of fact
Added to glossary by
Adrian MM. (X)
Mar 27, 2016 13:29
8 yrs ago
3 viewers *
French term
United Kingdom
Certified French Translator UK
Native in: English (Variant: British)
Works in: French to English
lié par les faits repris
French to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
court pleadings
On nous objectera que le juge du pays requis n’a pas à s’occuper des faits gisant à la base de la décision exequaturée, alors qu’il s’agit-là, apparemment, d’une question de fond qui s’impose au juge requis.
En droit national, non connaissons une situation similaire avec les recours en cassation. Le juge de la procédure de cassation est *lié par les faits repris* par les juges du fond.
Appeal proceedings.
thanks
En droit national, non connaissons une situation similaire avec les recours en cassation. Le juge de la procédure de cassation est *lié par les faits repris* par les juges du fond.
Appeal proceedings.
thanks
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +3 | bound by the matters of fact adopted or accepted |
Adrian MM. (X)
|
| 4 +1 | bound by the facts reiterated |
Cécile Gaultier
|
Change log
Apr 1, 2016 12:04: Adrian MM. (X) Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+3
1 hr
Selected
bound by the matters of fact adopted or accepted
as opposed to matters of law > en droit.
Reprendre does not mean reiterate in this context whereas, in a defence drafted in E&W law, the claimant's points of claim may be 'deemed repeated' to avoid writing them out in full.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 hrs (2016-03-28 07:40:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
boils down to: bound by the trial judges' findings of fact
Reprendre does not mean reiterate in this context whereas, in a defence drafted in E&W law, the claimant's points of claim may be 'deemed repeated' to avoid writing them out in full.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 hrs (2016-03-28 07:40:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
boils down to: bound by the trial judges' findings of fact
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Chakib Roula
14 mins
|
|
Shokran!
|
|
| agree |
philgoddard
: Chakib's hedging his bets there...
33 mins
|
|
Not any more...
|
|
| neutral |
Andrew Bramhall
: You can't "adopt'"matters of fact; they are facts or they aren't facts, they're accepted as fact, or rejected as such;
2 hrs
|
|
Not so, plus I have added 'accepted' to cover that predictable objection. www.llrx.com/features/turingtest.htm where there are at least 10 instances of the court's adoption of findings of fact.
|
|
| agree |
Jean-Claude Gouin
11 hrs
|
|
Merci and thanks!
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "thanks"
+1
1 hr
Cécile Gaultier
Native in French
Specializes in field
ENFR legal expert - sworn interpreter
Native in: French (Variant: Standard-France) 
Works in: English to French, French
Related KudoZ points
:
16
bound by the facts reiterated
bound by the facts reiterated or repeated (by the trial judge)
Discussion