Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Norwegian term or phrase:
bekk (in this context)
English translation:
stream/brook
Added to glossary by
liz askew
Jul 14, 2012 18:41
12 yrs ago
Norwegian term
bekk (in this context)
Norwegian to English
Other
Geography
"Dette er Noreg sitt svar på amerikanske Ville Vesten, men på dei vindpinte viddene streifar reinsdyr i staden for bøffel, og i bekkane rundt omkring finst det aure i staden for gull."
I am seeking responses from a very specific group, namely, native users of UK English. So if you're a Yank, please hold your fire unless you're Bill Bryson or have similar credentials from long tenure in the U.K.
The issue here is my desire to use "creek" for "bekk" in this instance. In the (formerly) Wild West, only Eastern dandies would use "brook". (Some of them still name their own kids "Brook" sometimes ...) In the West, "creek" is the nearly universal term for such watercourses, e.g., the famous Sutter('s) Creek. See http://toponymia.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/creeks-and-brooks/ for the historical background.
"Stream" is a little too general for my taste here.
However, my research indicates that the Brits will conceive of a creek as a tidal feature (just as we do here in New England.) The streams in question are located far inland, on the edge of Jotunheimen. For the purpose of this particular tourism promotion, can I get away with using the otherwise best choice "creek", without confusing Britishers (and angering Norwegians educated in the U.K.)? If not, am I doomed to use "brook" or "stream"?
I am seeking responses from a very specific group, namely, native users of UK English. So if you're a Yank, please hold your fire unless you're Bill Bryson or have similar credentials from long tenure in the U.K.
The issue here is my desire to use "creek" for "bekk" in this instance. In the (formerly) Wild West, only Eastern dandies would use "brook". (Some of them still name their own kids "Brook" sometimes ...) In the West, "creek" is the nearly universal term for such watercourses, e.g., the famous Sutter('s) Creek. See http://toponymia.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/creeks-and-brooks/ for the historical background.
"Stream" is a little too general for my taste here.
However, my research indicates that the Brits will conceive of a creek as a tidal feature (just as we do here in New England.) The streams in question are located far inland, on the edge of Jotunheimen. For the purpose of this particular tourism promotion, can I get away with using the otherwise best choice "creek", without confusing Britishers (and angering Norwegians educated in the U.K.)? If not, am I doomed to use "brook" or "stream"?
Proposed translations
(English)
4 +1 | stream/brook | liz askew |
Change log
Sep 13, 2012 07:37: liz askew Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+1
24 mins
Selected
stream/brook
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=on the edge of Jotunheimen&...
I would avoid "creek". It means something else to us Brits.
I am from Scotland, and we don't use the word "creek" to describe inland rivers/brooks/streams
In fact we call them "burns"!
I would avoid "creek". It means something else to us Brits.
I am from Scotland, and we don't use the word "creek" to describe inland rivers/brooks/streams
In fact we call them "burns"!
Note from asker:
Yes, I've dipped my toe already in the beck/bourne/brook/burn/nant/stream/syke waters. (And aren't things already complicated enough, without reference to a list that includes a citation from a .se domain? ;-) ) |
Peer comment(s):
agree |
brigidm
: But perhaps "brook" conveys the comparative smallness in size which I think you're looking for.
1 day 10 hrs
|
Thank you!
|
3 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks. I took "stream"."
Reference comments
11 mins
Reference:
Reports of cases argued and determined in the Court of King's ... - Google Books Result
books.google.co.uk/books?id=liUEAAAAQAAJ...1816
... divers large quantities of water from and out of the brooks, streams, or rivulets found and being within 20co yards of the canal, called or known by the name of ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 mins (2012-07-14 18:53:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
creek
is normally associated with mud:)
see Fareham creek
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5106648
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 mins (2012-07-14 18:55:02 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
i.e.
creek
is tidal
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2012-07-14 19:01:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-river-an...
A river is said to be a natural body of water that leads to an ocean or sea. On the contrary a creek is understood differently by different cultures. In British English creek means a narrow inlet of the sea, probably a sunken river valley. In Australia a creek means almost a river. It is interesting to note that a creek is called by other names such as a brook and a stream too in British English.
Geographers believe that although a creek is smaller than a river, there are some creeks that are considerably larger and longer than some rivers. In fact they are described as stronger than some rivers too. There are some large creeks and small rivers in the United States of America for that matter.
books.google.co.uk/books?id=liUEAAAAQAAJ...1816
... divers large quantities of water from and out of the brooks, streams, or rivulets found and being within 20co yards of the canal, called or known by the name of ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 mins (2012-07-14 18:53:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
creek
is normally associated with mud:)
see Fareham creek
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5106648
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 mins (2012-07-14 18:55:02 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
i.e.
creek
is tidal
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2012-07-14 19:01:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-river-an...
A river is said to be a natural body of water that leads to an ocean or sea. On the contrary a creek is understood differently by different cultures. In British English creek means a narrow inlet of the sea, probably a sunken river valley. In Australia a creek means almost a river. It is interesting to note that a creek is called by other names such as a brook and a stream too in British English.
Geographers believe that although a creek is smaller than a river, there are some creeks that are considerably larger and longer than some rivers. In fact they are described as stronger than some rivers too. There are some large creeks and small rivers in the United States of America for that matter.
Discussion
We twa hae paidl’d i' the burn, frae morning sun till dine; But seas between us braid hae roar’d, which Jeppe Aakjaer translated to bekk in Danish.
Why do you need BE when you are talking about the Wild West (in the US presumably)?
sin auld lang syne.
"Nor were trout unfamiliar to these settlers. Trout were abundant in English streams—true trout, brown trout to be exact, a close relative and genealogical spinoff of Atlantic salmon. That the fish they saw in Town Brook were really charr made no difference to Priscilla Mullins or anyone else who went there to fetch a pail of water. They were shaped like brown trout and they had spots like brown trout, although colored a bit differently. The only real distinction was that they tasted a lot better than English trout. These had to be trout, and because they were found in brooks, henceforth they were called brook trout." – http://tinyurl.com/7heumpe
The reason that American brooks are no longer fishable is a consequence of 400 years of European settlement.