Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
l'appareil était centré très arrière
English translation:
the aircraft's center of gravity was too far back
Added to glossary by
Yolanda Broad
Sep 29, 2003 12:53
21 yrs ago
French term
centré très arrière
French to English
Tech/Engineering
Aerospace / Aviation / Space
aviation
This is in a decision by the Cour de Cassation, about a plane crash. It talks about the weight of the passengers exceeding the weight authorised, and "que l'appareil était centré très arrière, que la puissance de son moteur était réduit..."
I might have got the accents wrong as the decision is all in capital letters. "arrièré" perhaps?
I might have got the accents wrong as the decision is all in capital letters. "arrièré" perhaps?
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
+2
37 mins
Selected
the aircraft's center of gravity was too far back
... How is the center of gravity of an airplane calculated? - Akhilesh Kumar Kashyap
The center of gravity (CG) is ... If too far back, the plane becomes unstable. ...
www.aerospaceweb.org/question/design/q0036.shtml - 16k - Cached - Similar pages
Akaishi Aviation: Welcome to the edge.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-09-29 13:31:54 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
correct grammar
to be too far back
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-09-29 14:42:25 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Note to magnum:
Then the center of gravity was DISPLACED too far back
and not \"far to the back\"....
As I said: a center of gravity cannot move to the back of the plane grammatically in English...it became displaced, it was displaced.....only a person or animal can move back...
sorry, but it\'s important to be grammatical and although you did get the idea, the grammar is off. Believe me, I would do the same thing in French....no hard feelings
The center of gravity (CG) is ... If too far back, the plane becomes unstable. ...
www.aerospaceweb.org/question/design/q0036.shtml - 16k - Cached - Similar pages
Akaishi Aviation: Welcome to the edge.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-09-29 13:31:54 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
correct grammar
to be too far back
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-09-29 14:42:25 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Note to magnum:
Then the center of gravity was DISPLACED too far back
and not \"far to the back\"....
As I said: a center of gravity cannot move to the back of the plane grammatically in English...it became displaced, it was displaced.....only a person or animal can move back...
sorry, but it\'s important to be grammatical and although you did get the idea, the grammar is off. Believe me, I would do the same thing in French....no hard feelings
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks Jane - and the others who contributed.
Mary"
6 mins
The centre of the plane's weight distribution was located very
far to the back/ a long way to the back.
It is "arrière". It is like a centre of gravity that is located too far back but in a plane I doubt if you can mention gravity!!!!
It is "arrière". It is like a centre of gravity that is located too far back but in a plane I doubt if you can mention gravity!!!!
+1
31 mins
...and aircraft's center of gravity moved far to the back of the plane
One of the reasons for why an aircraft stays aloft is that the center of gravity is located somewhere near the center of lift of the wing. Because the center of gravity is critical to the aircraft's ability to fly, a determination of the aircraft's center of gravity and total weight is necessary, and, required by the FAA, JAR and most other Civil aviation authorities before every take-off. An overloaded or improperly balanced aircraft will require more power and greater fuel consumption to maintain flight, and the stability and controllability will be seriously affected
See more at
http://www.flyware.net/show.aspx?MainCat=products&SubCat=1
See more at
http://www.flyware.net/show.aspx?MainCat=products&SubCat=1
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Roddy Stegemann
: Yes, center of gravity
3 mins
|
merci
|
|
neutral |
Jane Lamb-Ruiz (X)
: the center of gravity does not move back; it is far back or isn't far back...
7 mins
|
Because of weight redistribution the position of plane's center of gravity DID move from its original location before boarding.
|
7 hrs
centre (of gravity) was too far aft ; mass was centred too far aft
In naval architecture, which employs many terms from the field of aviation, a weights and centres study (devis de poids) is carried out to determine where and how weight should distributed across the platform.
Centres are not limited to just gravity. You will also find a centre of bouyancy, flotation, lateral resistance. All of these enter into the equation and form part of the wieghts and centre study.
Whilst what I have set out relates to boats, it seems perfectly logoical that the similar calucaltions must be taken into account in airplane construction. Therefore, the reference to "centre" is not to be interpreted just to mean centre of gravity. There must be a number of different "centres".
In any event, the (short) extract we have, suggests that the centre (no doubt the of gravity, the centre of mass) is too far aft and that upsets the longitudinal trim of the craft and eventually her fore and aft / centreline stability.
One or two quick references relating to aviation :
1 - aviation-safety.net/database/1949/490310-0.htm
2 - www.weighing-systems.com/TechnologyCentre/ aircraftweighing.html
read through the bit on BALANCE, STABILITY, AND CENTER OF GRAVITY
Centres are not limited to just gravity. You will also find a centre of bouyancy, flotation, lateral resistance. All of these enter into the equation and form part of the wieghts and centre study.
Whilst what I have set out relates to boats, it seems perfectly logoical that the similar calucaltions must be taken into account in airplane construction. Therefore, the reference to "centre" is not to be interpreted just to mean centre of gravity. There must be a number of different "centres".
In any event, the (short) extract we have, suggests that the centre (no doubt the of gravity, the centre of mass) is too far aft and that upsets the longitudinal trim of the craft and eventually her fore and aft / centreline stability.
One or two quick references relating to aviation :
1 - aviation-safety.net/database/1949/490310-0.htm
2 - www.weighing-systems.com/TechnologyCentre/ aircraftweighing.html
read through the bit on BALANCE, STABILITY, AND CENTER OF GRAVITY
Reference:
aviation-safety.net/database/1949/490310-0.htm
www.weighing-systems.com/TechnologyCentre/ aircraftweighing.html
Something went wrong...