May 23, 2007 10:38
17 yrs ago
English term
with influence based on personal insight
English
Other
Human Resources
Meeting rooms
Space and furniture in meeting rooms speak volumes about expectations: a U-shaped table implies a two-way dialog between presenter and participants, while a round one implies team problem solving ***with influence based on personal insight***. Or consider flip charts and overheads versus LCD projectors - the former encourage interaction, the latter passive listening.
Space and furniture in meeting rooms speak volumes about expectations: a U-shaped table implies a two-way dialog between presenter and participants, while a round one implies team problem solving ***with influence based on personal insight***. Or consider flip charts and overheads versus LCD projectors - the former encourage interaction, the latter passive listening.
Responses
+1
2 hrs
Selected
no inherent influence due to an advantageous position
***with influence based on personal insight***.
The phrase quoted by the asker applies ONLY to the "round" seated arrangement.
The writer contrasts the two seating arrangements, saying that:
- the "U" arrangement promotes dialog between the presenter and the participants
- the "round" one promotes dialog in a "team", where the presenter does not have more influence simply because of his position - he/She has an equal influence because a round arrangement gives none of the people an advantage. Thus, the only way to have more influence than another is through your knowledge, skill or "insight".
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2007-05-23 12:41:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Hmmm, after posting I re-read Bill's answer and realise I had originally misunderstood him - thus leading to my post. In reality, he says almost the same.
The phrase quoted by the asker applies ONLY to the "round" seated arrangement.
The writer contrasts the two seating arrangements, saying that:
- the "U" arrangement promotes dialog between the presenter and the participants
- the "round" one promotes dialog in a "team", where the presenter does not have more influence simply because of his position - he/She has an equal influence because a round arrangement gives none of the people an advantage. Thus, the only way to have more influence than another is through your knowledge, skill or "insight".
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2007-05-23 12:41:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Hmmm, after posting I re-read Bill's answer and realise I had originally misunderstood him - thus leading to my post. In reality, he says almost the same.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you, Craig! And thank you, Bill! Now I get it :o)"
+7
15 mins
See below...
I think they mean that the influence you have in such an seating arrangement means that your contribution (influence) to is based on the insights you have rather than your "furniture-created" authority (as with the U shape arrangement, the flipchart or the PowerPoint projector!)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2007-05-23 10:55:22 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I might also add here, "your furniture created LACK of authority"; i.e. the furniture arrangment can actually disempower you and your contribution to the problem solving in some of these seating arrangements!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 17 mins (2007-05-23 10:55:22 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I might also add here, "your furniture created LACK of authority"; i.e. the furniture arrangment can actually disempower you and your contribution to the problem solving in some of these seating arrangements!
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Richard Benham
: In other words, if you've got something helpful to say, you'll be listened to.
5 mins
|
Thanks, Richard!
|
|
agree |
Vicky Papaprodromou
48 mins
|
Thanks, Vicky!
|
|
agree |
Alexander Demyanov
2 hrs
|
Thanks, Alexander!
|
|
agree |
Robert Fox
3 hrs
|
Thanks, Robert!
|
|
agree |
Elena Aleksandrova
7 hrs
|
Thanks, Elena!
|
|
agree |
Alfa Trans (X)
3 days 3 hrs
|
Thanks, Marju!
|
|
agree |
Asghar Bhatti
3 days 5 hrs
|
Thanks, Asghar!
|
Something went wrong...