This question was closed without grading. Reason: Answer found elsewhere
Nov 6, 2012 19:01
12 yrs ago
English term
Capitalization or not
English
Science
Computers: Systems, Networks
informatics
“From Theorem 3.2.2.8. follows ... ”
I would not capitalize "theorem" here, but capitalization of such cases is used throughout the thesis.
Other examples:
"“… where _(k) was calculated in the Proof of Proposition 3.2.1.4 on page 24.” here I would neither capitalize "proof" nor "proposition."
In the following, the measures of system performance as defined in Section 3.2.5 will be calculated for the M=M=1=1 system with (r:S)- policy from Section 3.2.4 exemplarily.” or here "section"
Some imput?
I would not capitalize "theorem" here, but capitalization of such cases is used throughout the thesis.
Other examples:
"“… where _(k) was calculated in the Proof of Proposition 3.2.1.4 on page 24.” here I would neither capitalize "proof" nor "proposition."
In the following, the measures of system performance as defined in Section 3.2.5 will be calculated for the M=M=1=1 system with (r:S)- policy from Section 3.2.4 exemplarily.” or here "section"
Some imput?
Responses
5 +1 | examples of capitalization | airmailrpl |
Responses
+1
13 hrs
examples of capitalization
ON FAMILIES OF MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE SETS (Received August ...
https://wwwad.bolyai.hu/~p_erdos/1943-04.pdf
Corollary 2 formulates a condition which is necessary for a cardinal number n to be regular and >8o . From Theorem I it follows that this condition is at the same ...
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica ...
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103...
Since this reasoning is valid "x(t) Î E(P,c), x ¹ 0, "t > 0, from Theorem 2 it follows that E(P,c) is a region of stability for the saturated system. Similarly to Propositions ...
Bilipschitz determinacy of quasihomogeneous germs - ICMC-USP
www.icmc.usp.br/~sma/cadernos/toc3.1/cidinha.pdf
From Theorem 3.3.3 it follows that f + tθ is strongly bilipschitz trivial for each θ(x, t) such that fil(θ) ⩾ 4n − 1. Proof (of the Proposition 3.3.5). Let m = 3n − 2.
Atatürkçülük - Busca Aqui! Meta Buscador
www.buscaaqui.com.br/meta/busca.php?q...
From Theorem 3 follows directly that for normal matrices, i.e. AA T = ATA, with a small ... www.cs.illinois.edu/class/sp07/cs550/files/weiss.pdf · ATAT RK L K ...
2 0 0 9 Cubo A Mathematical Journal - Departamento de ...
www.dmat.ufpe.br/CUBO/files/v11n3/cubo_v11n3_august_2009.pd...
From Theorem 3.1 it follows that there is a unique fixed point of J(ε), say z(ε), such that z(ε) = T(N ρ, ε)z(ε) + y and z(ε) is continuous in ε. Furthermore, z(ε)=(I − T(N ...
Universidade Católica de Brasília
www.bdtd.ucb.br/tede/tde_busca/processaArquivo.php?...1249
From Theorem 3.1, it follows that qj > 0 and (p0C − q) > 0,∀j. Hence, (¯θ, ¯ϕ) = (0,0). This contradicts our assumption, so we forced to conclude ...
https://wwwad.bolyai.hu/~p_erdos/1943-04.pdf
Corollary 2 formulates a condition which is necessary for a cardinal number n to be regular and >8o . From Theorem I it follows that this condition is at the same ...
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica ...
www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103...
Since this reasoning is valid "x(t) Î E(P,c), x ¹ 0, "t > 0, from Theorem 2 it follows that E(P,c) is a region of stability for the saturated system. Similarly to Propositions ...
Bilipschitz determinacy of quasihomogeneous germs - ICMC-USP
www.icmc.usp.br/~sma/cadernos/toc3.1/cidinha.pdf
From Theorem 3.3.3 it follows that f + tθ is strongly bilipschitz trivial for each θ(x, t) such that fil(θ) ⩾ 4n − 1. Proof (of the Proposition 3.3.5). Let m = 3n − 2.
Atatürkçülük - Busca Aqui! Meta Buscador
www.buscaaqui.com.br/meta/busca.php?q...
From Theorem 3 follows directly that for normal matrices, i.e. AA T = ATA, with a small ... www.cs.illinois.edu/class/sp07/cs550/files/weiss.pdf · ATAT RK L K ...
2 0 0 9 Cubo A Mathematical Journal - Departamento de ...
www.dmat.ufpe.br/CUBO/files/v11n3/cubo_v11n3_august_2009.pd...
From Theorem 3.1 it follows that there is a unique fixed point of J(ε), say z(ε), such that z(ε) = T(N ρ, ε)z(ε) + y and z(ε) is continuous in ε. Furthermore, z(ε)=(I − T(N ...
Universidade Católica de Brasília
www.bdtd.ucb.br/tede/tde_busca/processaArquivo.php?...1249
From Theorem 3.1, it follows that qj > 0 and (p0C − q) > 0,∀j. Hence, (¯θ, ¯ϕ) = (0,0). This contradicts our assumption, so we forced to conclude ...
Discussion
I would extend this to things like Theorem, Proof, Figure, Table, if these are specifically referred to by name.
So I would write:
"This point will be illustrated in a figure in Chapter 2"
but:
"Here we can see from Table 2 (page 65) that Theorem 6 above can be proved by Equation 13 below."