Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
swinging guardrail to guardrail
English answer:
swinging wildly between different strategies / with no consistent course of action
English term
swinging guardrail to guardrail
I don't understand what is meant by this expression. Could you please clarify it as I couldn't find it online? Here is the context:
"As CEO, what are you doing to manage the tensions?
I try to bring them to the surface and make them explicit, so that they’re right in front of people all the time—and that helps. It’s important to talk about them not as a choice, where one or the other is more important, but as a balance we must continually strive to achieve. I think it’s a mistake in organizations to oversimplify by conveying a sole focus on one end of the spectrum at the expense of the other—for example, “We must deliver short-term results.” When you do this, you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more powerful to talk about the “and” of focusing on both the short-term and the long-term objectives. By doing that, you start teaching the organization how to appreciate and deal with the inherent paradoxes."
Thanks a lot in advance.
Non-PRO (2): Chris Says Bye, Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
swinging wildly between different strategies / with no consistent course of action
reacting to external challenges by a series of inconsistent short-term quick fixes
or
resorting to erratic short-term reactions (instead of a proactive approach)
or
absence of direction
etc.
I see the image of a ship in a storm, and someone being flung from the guardrails on one side to the guardrails on the other side, as the ship is being kicked in all directions by the storm.
Translated in the case of managing a business: the business being kicked from all sides by external forces and the management trying to stay afloat by a series of inconsistent short-term quick fixes, instead of following some steady long term strategy.
There are in fact only TWO texts you can find on the Web where "swinging guardrail to guardrail" was used:
this one (republished on many websites):
"As CEO, what are you doing to manage the tensions?
I try to bring them to the surface and make them explicit, so that they’re right in front of people all the time—and that helps. It’s important to talk about them not as a choice, where one or the other is more important, but as a balance we must continually strive to achieve. I think it’s a mistake in organizations to oversimplify by conveying a sole focus on one end of the spectrum at the expense of the other—for example, “We must deliver short-term results.” When you do this, you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more powerful to talk about the “and” of focusing on both the short-term and the long-term objectives. By doing that, you start teaching the organization how to appreciate and deal with the inherent paradoxes."
https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nz/Documents/...
and further down in the same text, the same idea expressed slightly differently:
The inherent features of strategic paradoxes make managing in such an environment very difficult. The leader’s challenge is not to choose between alternatives but to recognize that both imperatives must be addressed. Making that change from either/ or to both/and thinking requires leaders to shift focus frequently in the short term in order to satisfy competing demands in the long term. Rather than swinging wildly between opposing forces, leaders must execute purposeful microshifts that enable growth and sustainability.
The other one, where this idea of erratic short-term reactions (instead of a consistent proactive approach) also fits:
Catherine Knibbs coined the phrase “cyber trauma” and is the author of The Darker Side of the Internet for Children And Young People. This is not conservative doom and gloom. We get into attachment and neuroscience and provide realistic recommendations to help you and your children navigate the web, unpack myths, identify cyber bullying, discuss consent and provide proactive strategies that lead towards integration and health.
Respond more adaptively to the internet and social media rather than swinging guardrail-to-guardrail with unkept promises and overreactions. Explore the positive and negative elements of having a global “village” you can access instantly, anywhere via our phones and discuss the impact of the internet on developing minds and the interpersonal realm of young people and adults.
https://therapistuncensored.com/episodes/tu58-improving-the-...
you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail
=
you end up not knowing where you're going / being forced into a succession of erratic quick fixes
agree |
AllegroTrans
: I can't "guess" any other meaning; sounds just like BoJo in the Covid crisis
13 hrs
|
You got a good point there! Thanks!
|
|
agree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: simply means no clear plan of action so just being flung around from one side to another. Guardrails are there to save you from danger
1 day 10 hrs
|
Thanks!
|
swinging gaurdrail to gaurdrail
Reference comments
I am sure the answer is in one of these refs
Therapist Uncensored
https://therapistuncensored.com › episodes › tu58-imp...
28 Mar 2018 — Respond more adaptively to the internet and social media rather than swinging guardrail-to-guardrail with unkept promises and overreactions.
SPOTLIGHT
Deloitte
https://www2.deloitte.com › both-and-leadership
When you do this, you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more powerful to talk about the “and” of focusing on both the short-term and the.
9 pages
session 6 article.pdf - HRadar Intelligent content in one...
Course Hero
https://www.coursehero.com › ... › MOM › MOM EC1001
” When you do this , you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail . It is much more powerful to talk about the “ and ” of focusing on both the short - term ...
Improving the Interpersonal World of the Internet for Both Kids ...
Amazon Music
https://music.amazon.com › podcasts › episodes › therapi...
... swinging guardrail-to-guardrail with unkept promises and overreactions. Explore the positive and negative elements of having a global “village” you can ...
Both/And Leadership. Don t worry so much about being ...
DocPlayer.net
https://docplayer.net › 94705386-Both-and-leadership...
When you do this, you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail. it is much more powerful to talk about the and of focusing on both the short-term and the long ...
07 - Both and Leadership - Harvard Business Review Article
Scribd
https://www.scribd.com › document › 07-Both-and-Lead...
18 Jul 2023 — When you do this, you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more for instance, at the expense of innovation, the risk powerful ...
Harvard Business Review USA - May 2016
glassyad.ir
http://glassyad.ir › economics_marketing › Harvar...
1 May 2016 — When you do this, you end up swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more powerful to talk about the “and” of focusing on both the short ...
128 pages
HBR's 10 Must Reads on Leadership, Vol. 2 (with bonus ...
google.co.uk
https://books.google.co.uk › books
Harvard Business Review, Daniel Goleman, Michael D. Watkins · 2020 · Business & Economics
... swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more powerful to talk about the “and” of focusing on both the short-term and the long-term objectives. By doing ...
HBR's 10 Must Reads on Leadership 2-Volume Collection
google.co.uk
https://books.google.co.uk › books
Harvard Business Review · 2020 · Business & Economics
... swinging guardrail to guardrail. It is much more powerful to talk about the “and” of focusing on both the short-term and the long-term objectives. By doing ...
Discussion