English to Russian Law/Patents Patents

Статья о сроке давности для пересмотра патентов с участием сторон
Given the risks at play, a natural question for litigants became what could be done if the PTAB incorrectly applied or failed to apply the IPR time bar? The Federal Circuit answered this question, at least for the time being, in Achates, holding that PTAB decisions on the time bar are part of the institution decision and, therefore, are not appealable. After Achates was decided, however, the Supreme Court decided Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016). Though the majority of the Supreme Court justices agreed that institution decisions are largely not reviewable on appeal, the majority also cautioned that its ruling did not “categorically preclude review of a final decision” or “enable the agency to act outside its statutory limits.” The Court further warned if PTAB exceeds its statutory authority or violates due process, “such ‘shenanigans’ may be properly reviewable.”
As reported last year, the patent owner in Wi-Fi One v. Broadcom argued that Cuozzo called into question the Achates holding and persuaded the Federal Circuit to review en banc its own decision denying judicial review of a PTAB institution decision that found the time-bar did not apply.

Запуталась в последнем предложении
Как сообщалось в прошлом году, владелец патента, являющийся стороной в деле Wi-Fi One против Broadcom привел аргумент о том, что компания Cuozzo поставила под сомнение решение, вынесенное по делу компании Achates и убедила Федеральный суд пересмотреть в полном составе свое собственное решение (а дальше запуталась...)

Спасибо!