Jan 16, 2019 20:15
5 yrs ago
24 viewers *
English term
Pitfalls
English to Spanish
Bus/Financial
Education / Pedagogy
Evaluation of course assessments
There are a number of pitfalls in assessment that can affect how fairly and validly we assess learners. These problems are rarely prevalent with objective test items but raise significant concerns when assessing assignments that involve professional assignments or judgements on the levels of competence performance.
Let’s take a closer look at the typical pitfalls in assessment that need to be avoided as far as possible:
The halo effect
The halo effect is where our existing conceptions of a learner’s work is affected by subsequent marking. If we are used to a high standard of work from a learner, we may develop a tendency to over-mark future poorer work. The converse is also true in the case of students who are generally perceived as less able.
The contrast effect
The contrast effect arises when the outcomes of an assessment are affected by comparing a particular response to another, whether the work is good or bad. If we have just assessed several weak assignments and are then presented with quite a well-presented one, there is the danger of giving it more marks than it perhaps really deserves.
Assessing progress and effort rather than achievement
Assessing progress and effort rather than achievement occurs when an assessor is distracted by the efforts and progress a learner has made, rather than focusing on the actual attainments in relation to the learning outcomes and assessment criteria.
Lack of clarity with the marking scheme and the standard required
Lack of clarity with the marking scheme and the standard required is a common problem resulting from not being sure about what to assess and what allocation of marks to make to parts of the assessment activity. Most essential assessors are familiar with the learning outcomes and the type and standard of learners’ performance relating to the assessment.
Discriminatory practices
In assessment, as in other situations, this occurs when the assessor discriminates, either positively or negatively in relation to a learner because of race, gender, creed, sexual preference or special needs. Care needs to be taken to ensure that learners receive fair and equal opportunities during their assessments.
Gracias
Let’s take a closer look at the typical pitfalls in assessment that need to be avoided as far as possible:
The halo effect
The halo effect is where our existing conceptions of a learner’s work is affected by subsequent marking. If we are used to a high standard of work from a learner, we may develop a tendency to over-mark future poorer work. The converse is also true in the case of students who are generally perceived as less able.
The contrast effect
The contrast effect arises when the outcomes of an assessment are affected by comparing a particular response to another, whether the work is good or bad. If we have just assessed several weak assignments and are then presented with quite a well-presented one, there is the danger of giving it more marks than it perhaps really deserves.
Assessing progress and effort rather than achievement
Assessing progress and effort rather than achievement occurs when an assessor is distracted by the efforts and progress a learner has made, rather than focusing on the actual attainments in relation to the learning outcomes and assessment criteria.
Lack of clarity with the marking scheme and the standard required
Lack of clarity with the marking scheme and the standard required is a common problem resulting from not being sure about what to assess and what allocation of marks to make to parts of the assessment activity. Most essential assessors are familiar with the learning outcomes and the type and standard of learners’ performance relating to the assessment.
Discriminatory practices
In assessment, as in other situations, this occurs when the assessor discriminates, either positively or negatively in relation to a learner because of race, gender, creed, sexual preference or special needs. Care needs to be taken to ensure that learners receive fair and equal opportunities during their assessments.
Gracias
Proposed translations
(Spanish)
4 +1 | sesgos | Karol Tapia de Moya, MSc. |
4 | trampas / escollos / dificultades | Carlos Morales |
3 | equívocos | Chema Nieto Castañón |
3 | desajustes | JohnMcDove |
Proposed translations
+1
14 hrs
Selected
sesgos
Yo te sugeriría que utilizarás el término "sesgo", ya que creo que es lo que mejor se aplicaría a el ámbito de la evaluación. De hecho, el efecto halo y los demás mencionados son por definición, sesgos cognitivos.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 hrs (2019-01-17 10:34:18 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Lo siento, quiero hacer dos ediciones:
-errores: utilizaras* al*
-una fuente: puedes leer sobre sesgos cognitivos a partir de la página 41: http://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/10651/13074/1/Trab...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 hrs (2019-01-17 10:34:18 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Lo siento, quiero hacer dos ediciones:
-errores: utilizaras* al*
-una fuente: puedes leer sobre sesgos cognitivos a partir de la página 41: http://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/10651/13074/1/Trab...
Example sentence:
sesgos
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Gracias"
2 mins
trampas / escollos / dificultades
Puede ser. Saludos.
22 mins
equívocos
En este caso, el original se refiere específicamente a equívocos (confusiones que producen juicios desatinados) producidos inadvertidamente por los evaluadores. Cualquiera de las opciones planteadas por Carlos sería correcta en todo caso; efectivamente, se trata de dificultades o escollos. Más ajustada es la idea de trampa, aunque en castellano suena más a engaño que a equívoco, que diría es lo que traslada el original; equívocos que es preciso evitar en la medida de lo posible.
1 hr
desajustes
En este contexto me parece que "desajustes" se ajusta como anillo al dedo... ;-)
Ejemplo del CREA:
http://corpus.rae.es/creanet.html
Una obra que sigue manteniendo el mismo desapasionamiento y la misma frialdad al señalar, discretamente y casi en voz baja, algunas perplejidades sobre el propio objeto artístico, algunos [Anterior]desajustes en[Siguiente] el sistema de valoraciones.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AÑO: 1991
AUTOR: PRENSA
TÍTULO: ABC Cultural, 20/12/1991 : ANGEL BADOS, OTRA VUELTA EN EL CAMINO
PAÍS: ESPAÑA
TEMA: 04.Escultura
PUBLICACIÓN: VIRTUAL ON LINE S.L. (Madrid), 1991
Otro ejemplo al googlear:
... en que existen importantes irregularidades y desajustes en la evaluación
file:///C:/Users/internet/Downloads/75803-96566-1-PB.pdf
Saludos cordiales.
Ejemplo del CREA:
http://corpus.rae.es/creanet.html
Una obra que sigue manteniendo el mismo desapasionamiento y la misma frialdad al señalar, discretamente y casi en voz baja, algunas perplejidades sobre el propio objeto artístico, algunos [Anterior]desajustes en[Siguiente] el sistema de valoraciones.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AÑO: 1991
AUTOR: PRENSA
TÍTULO: ABC Cultural, 20/12/1991 : ANGEL BADOS, OTRA VUELTA EN EL CAMINO
PAÍS: ESPAÑA
TEMA: 04.Escultura
PUBLICACIÓN: VIRTUAL ON LINE S.L. (Madrid), 1991
Otro ejemplo al googlear:
... en que existen importantes irregularidades y desajustes en la evaluación
file:///C:/Users/internet/Downloads/75803-96566-1-PB.pdf
Saludos cordiales.
Discussion