Romanian term
Romania
Native in: Romanian (Variant: Romania) 
, English
Works in: Romanian to English, Romanian to French, English to Romanian, and 1 more.
în complet de divergență
| 3 +3 | three-judge panel / uneven-number panel |
Annamaria Amik
|
Dec 5, 2015 11:59: changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"
Dec 6, 2015 04:26: Karen Zaragoza changed "Vetting" from "Needs Vetting" to "Vet OK"
Dec 6, 2015 07:41: Annamaria Amik changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (3): Sandra & Kenneth Grossman, Claudia Coja, Annamaria Amik
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Magistra artis reddendi
Native in: Hungarian , Romanian
Works in: Romanian to English, Hungarian to English, English to Romanian, and 5 more.
three-judge panel / uneven-number panel
http://legeaz.net/dictionar-juridic/complet-de-divergenta
colectiv format dintr-un număr impar (trei) de judecători în vederea soluţionării litigiului, dacă cu prilejul deliberării nu s-a format o opinie unanimă în cadrul completului de judecată (format din doi judecători). C.d. este format din completul iniţial (cei doi judecători), care se întregeşte cu un al treilea judecător; cel de al treilea judecător poate fi preşedintele sau vicepreşedintele instanţei, preşedintele de secţie ori judecătorul din planificarea de permanenţă.
O traducere a Legii 304/2004 de pe lege5.ro http://lege5.ro/Gratuit/gmzdqnzvgu/law-no-304-2004-on-judici... foloseşte termenul "divergence panel of judges", dar, deoarece expresia apare doar pe site-uri româneşti, aş evita-o şi aş folosi expresiile care se regăsesc şi în legislaţia UK sau US.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/54/section/54
Section 54(4)
(5)Where—
(a)an appeal has been heard by a court consisting of an even number of judges; and
(b)the members of the court are equally divided,
the case shall, on the application of any part to the appeal, be re-argued before and determined by an uneven number of judges not less than three, before any appeal to the [F2Senior Courts].
http://www.firstpost.com/india/supreme-court-sets-up-three-j...
A three-judge bench was on Tuesday set up in the Supreme Court to decide the fate of Yakub Memon, the lone death row convict in 1993 Mumbai blasts case, after a two-judge bench was divided on his plea seeking stay of his execution scheduled on 30 July.
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/appeals/2347.htm
The three-judge panel also avoids the possibility of an evenly divided court.
Evident, nu e un echivalent perfect, dar poate te ajută, până vin colegii mai experimentaţi cu soluţia exactă.
Something went wrong...