Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Italian term or phrase:
Solve et repete
English translation:
solve et repete
Added to glossary by
Uldis Liepkalns
Nov 3, 2003 21:56
21 yrs ago
56 viewers *
Italian term
Latvia
Mark it as done
Works in: English to Latvian, English to Lithuanian, English to Estonian, and 11 more.
Solve et repete
Italian to English
Other
Clause in an agreement
Proposed translations
(English)
| 5 +4 | solve et repete |
Massimo Gaido
|
| 3 +1 | estoppel clause; barring of buyer's defences |
KirstyMacC (X)
|
| 4 | solve et repete |
Giovanna Comollo
|
Proposed translations
+4
5 mins
Massimo Gaido
United States
United States
Native in Italian
United States
Your business is my business.
Native in: Italian 
Works in: English to Italian, Spanish to Italian, French to Italian, and 12 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
1978
Selected
solve et repete
Solve et repete - No exception, save that of nullity, possibility of annulment, or rescission of the contract, can be posed by the purchaser with the purpose of delaying or avoiding payment.
http://www.indus.it/html/UK_codizioni_vendita.htm
http://www.indus.it/html/UK_codizioni_vendita.htm
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Txnx, and txnx also to Counsel"
+1
2 hrs
estoppel clause; barring of buyer's defences
The buyer is 'estopped' - stopped or barred - from entering defences with a view to defeating the contract.
There are some common Latin expression used in Anglo-Am law - solve et repete sure ain't one of them.
There are some common Latin expression used in Anglo-Am law - solve et repete sure ain't one of them.
3680 days
Giovanna Comollo
Italy
Italy
Native in Italian
Italy
my experience for your success
Native in: Italian (Variant: Standard-Italy)
Works in: English to Italian, German to Italian, French to Italian, and 1 more.
solve et repete
I am not convinced. Actually in Latin and in the Italian jargon this means that one pays first and then he can claim.... so I think estoppel or any of the above are really correct Could we leave it in Latin?
Something went wrong...