Japanese term
相互牽制の実効性確保の観点から
全文は、「相互牽制の実効性確保の観点から役職員の行為に対して法令上問題があると判断した他の役職員が法律専門家等に相談・連絡できるような体制が採られているか」です。
最後の「～が採られているか」は、これは検査マニュアルなので、検査対象会社に相応の機能の存在を要求するチェックポイントという意味です。
Whether there is a system in place whereby an officer or employee consults or communicates with legal counsels etc. regarding any doubt on legal or regulatory compliance of another officer or employee, to ensure efficacious mutual control and monitoring.
「mutual oversight」とか「interdependent monitoring」とか考えましたが、mutual control and monitoringと逃げました。何か適当な別な表現がありましたら、ご教授願います！
| 3 +1 | to ensure efficient checks and balances |
casey
|
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Something went wrong...