I am uncertain of this.. but this is what it could be...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 38 mins (2007-05-09 18:35:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://www.jstor.org/view/00027294/ap020416/02a00040/0

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 39 mins (2007-05-09 18:35:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://www.tudorplace.com.ar/RADCLIFFE3.htm

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 41 mins (2007-05-09 18:38:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The case of XXX's Appeal, 60 Pa. St. 408, cited by the auditor in his report, is in point here. Bergey received money belonging to his wife, being her ** patrimonial portion,** in her presence, and both united in a receipt for it. Not a word was spoken by the wife when her husband took up the money to count it, and put it in his pocket; nor was a word ever heard afterwards to the effect that the wife had made a gift of it. The husband appropriated it to the purchase of a farm, and the supreme court of the state held that no inference could arise of a gift from the transaction as detailed; observing that 'she was not bound to attempt a rescue of it from him, or proclaim that it was not a gift. She might rest on the idea that his receipt in her presence was with the intent to take care of it for her. In X vs Y's Adm'r, 31 Pa. St. 450, this court said, in a case of the nature of this: 'As the law made it [the money] hers, it presumes it to have been received for her by her husband.' That case contrasts the presumptions arising from the receipt of money by husbands, prior and subsequent to the act of 11th of April, 1848. In the first period the presumption is that he has received it under and by virtue of his marital

Could you not just use 'genes' for this? I realize that the German talks about ...anteile, but I think this might be overspecification.

My thought.

another solution, commonly used
Of course, this means genes!

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2007-05-09 20:17:24 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Genetics and dementiaMany people with dementia are concerned that their disease may have been ... however, inherited factors alone do not explain why some people develop it and ...
www.alzscot.org/pages/info/geneticsanddementia.htm - 24k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

[PDF] Genetics and dementiaFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
families with dementia. •. Among cases without a family link,. there is often a genetic component to. the disease; however, inherited factors ...
www.alzscot.org/downloads/genetics.pdf - Similar pages - Note this

Questions and answers - Alzheimer's Research TrustOnly very rare forms of dementia are caused by inherited factors alone. These represent about 1% of all cases of Alzheimer's and the symptoms usually appear ...
www.alzheimers-research.org.uk/info/questions/ - 12k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

Center for Human Genetics ResearchWhy do some people progress from forgetfulness to dementia? What are the inherited factors, the genes, that may cause or contribute to dementia? ...
phg.mc.vanderbilt.edu/content/studies - 18k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

Explaining about...dementia Working With Older People - Find ArticlesExplaining about...dementia from Working With Older People in Health ... There is no single gene for Alzheimer's disease, and inherited factors alone do not ...
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4134/is_200312/ai_n9335371