Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
Please explain!
English answer:
Explanation
Added to glossary by
Anna Maria Augustine (X)
Jul 10, 2006 13:10
18 yrs ago
10 viewers *
English term
Please explain!
English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
This does not apply insofar as the seller performed the transportation and the seller or the employees it assigns to this task have culpably caused the damage.
Now of what I understood, the person who has sold this device is not responsible for anything after the transportation is complete...what does the rest of the sentence mean!
Many many thanks :D
Now of what I understood, the person who has sold this device is not responsible for anything after the transportation is complete...what does the rest of the sentence mean!
Many many thanks :D
Responses
4 +13 | Explanation | Anna Maria Augustine (X) |
4 +3 | The seller is responsible | Mónica Ameztoy de Andrada |
Responses
+13
5 mins
Selected
Explanation
This does not apply because the seller carried out the transportation.
The seller or his/her employees who were given the task of dealing with transportation are guilty of causing damage.
This is explained in simple English.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2006-07-10 13:21:52 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Culpable means guilty therefore the seller or the employees are at fault for causing damage.
The seller or his/her employees who were given the task of dealing with transportation are guilty of causing damage.
This is explained in simple English.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2006-07-10 13:21:52 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Culpable means guilty therefore the seller or the employees are at fault for causing damage.
Note from asker:
This means that the seller or his/her employees are guilty in all cases, right! |
Peer comment(s):
agree |
jarry (X)
: Well put
1 min
|
Thank you
|
|
agree |
Mónica Ameztoy de Andrada
2 mins
|
Thank you ever so much
|
|
agree |
Marian Greenfield
2 mins
|
Thank you. Am trying to understand poor English.
|
|
neutral |
Roddy Stegemann
: Not necessarily guilty, but rather a probable cause, of the damage -- i.e., blameworthy. / A person who is guilty is surely culpable, but all who are culpable are not guilty.
5 mins
|
Culpable means guilty or at fault
|
|
agree |
yolanda Speece
: Exactly. It isn't simple or plain, though. It's legalese which if you don't speak it could be troublesome.
7 mins
|
Thank you
|
|
agree |
Marie Scarano
: seller is responsible - most likely rather than the producer or other intermediaries.
8 mins
|
Thank you
|
|
agree |
Sol
: Yes. And I don't see what the problem is. It's very clear. The previous sentence does not apply if the seller transported the items and he or his employees damaged the items while transporting them.
30 mins
|
Legalese is not easy for a non native English speaker. Worse even in French.
|
|
agree |
Andy Watkinson
: I don't see what the problem is either.
59 mins
|
Thank you
|
|
agree |
Dave Calderhead
1 hr
|
Ta
|
|
agree |
MikeGarcia
2 hrs
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Alfa Trans (X)
2 hrs
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Romanian Translator (X)
5 hrs
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Asghar Bhatti
: Culpable homicideamounting to murder
12 hrs
|
agree |
Lubain Masum
19 days
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks a million :)"
+3
8 mins
The seller is responsible
The seller is responsible because the damage occurred before delivery, and was caused by "the employees it assigns to this task" during, apparently, transportation
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Tony M
: I think the salient point is that EVEN IF this is 'in transit' damage, that was still the Seller's responsibility in this case...
1 min
|
Thank you so much, Tony :))
|
|
agree |
Nesrin
11 mins
|
Thank you, Nesrin :))
|
|
agree |
MikeGarcia
: Greetings, smiling lady, from a craquelé grandpa...
2 hrs
|
Many thanks ;)
|
Discussion
The damage has not yet been caused, but IF it is deliberately /culpably caused by the seller's employees who are responsible for transport, the previous clause does not apply.
I thought as much :)