Mar 13, 2006 22:14
18 yrs ago
English term
was, would
English
Other
Linguistics
OECD Secretary-General Donald Johnston said that it was still very difficult to predict right now whether the 6-day WTO Hong Kong conference would be able to achieve any breakthrough progress on global trade issues.
Is it right to use "was" and "would" in this paragraph??? I'm tempted to use "is" and "will", but I'm not sure about the rules.
Is it right to use "was" and "would" in this paragraph??? I'm tempted to use "is" and "will", but I'm not sure about the rules.
Responses
4 +10 | It is correct | Jack Doughty |
4 +9 | yes, it is correct as is | Brie Vernier |
5 +2 | either way | Richard Creech |
4 +1 | "was" and "would" | William [Bill] Gray |
Change log
Mar 13, 2006 22:24: NancyLynn changed "Term asked" from "Indirect speech" to "was, would"
Responses
+10
6 mins
English term (edited):
indirect speech
Selected
It is correct
You would only use "is" and "will" if this were direct speech: Gen. Johnson said: "It is still very difficult..."
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Anna Quail
5 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Marina Soldati
6 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Giulia Barontini
26 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Walter Landesman
46 mins
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Oana Apetrei
: or if : ...Donald Johnston SAYS that it IS ...
8 hrs
|
Thank you. Yes.
|
|
agree |
Armorel Young
: Simple example: someone saying "I will come" becomes in reported speech "He says he will come" (present) or "He said he would come" (past tense, like your statement).
10 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Alison Jenner
10 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Isodynamia
12 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Romanian Translator (X)
15 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
|
agree |
Alfa Trans (X)
20 hrs
|
Thank you.
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
+1
6 mins
English term (edited):
indirect speech
"was" and "would"
Since this is already finished, there is a clear "past time" element in the sentence. If the conference was still being held (or not yet held) I would recommend using the present tenses, even though it is reported speech.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Ingeborg Gowans (X)
1 min
|
Thank you.
|
+9
5 mins
English term (edited):
indirect speech
yes, it is correct as is
that is common usage for reported speech
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 mins (2006-03-13 22:22:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/reportedspeech.htm
As a rule when you report something someone has said you go back a tense
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 mins (2006-03-13 22:22:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
See also: http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/reportedspeech.htm
As a rule when you report something someone has said you go back a tense
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Romanian Translator (X)
3 mins
|
Thanks, Awana
|
|
agree |
Anna Quail
8 mins
|
Thanks, F2E
|
|
agree |
Giulia Barontini
: Very nice explanation!
28 mins
|
Thanks, Giulia
|
|
agree |
Walter Landesman
47 mins
|
Thanks, Walter
|
|
agree |
SirReaL
1 hr
|
Thanks, Mikhail
|
|
agree |
Refugio
: said + was
6 hrs
|
Thanks, Ruth
|
|
agree |
Oana Apetrei
8 hrs
|
Thanks, Oana
|
|
agree |
Alison Jenner
10 hrs
|
Thanks, Alison
|
|
agree |
Yaron Dahan
: yep.. reported speech
23 hrs
|
Thanks, Yaron
|
+2
21 mins
either way
Regardless of what conservative grammar books might say, both forms are used by English speakers in different contexts. The use of "is" and "will" would imply a level of agreement with the speaker's comments that is absent with the "was/would" form.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
SirReaL
1 hr
|
agree |
Rutie Eckdish
2 hrs
|
neutral |
Christine Andersen
: Very true, but in formal writing I would still go with the 'conservative' tenses used, to preserve the nuances of meaning.
8 hrs
|
Discussion