Mar 13, 2006 22:14
18 yrs ago
English term

was, would

English Other Linguistics
OECD Secretary-General Donald Johnston said that it was still very difficult to predict right now whether the 6-day WTO Hong Kong conference would be able to achieve any breakthrough progress on global trade issues.

Is it right to use "was" and "would" in this paragraph??? I'm tempted to use "is" and "will", but I'm not sure about the rules.
Change log

Mar 13, 2006 22:24: NancyLynn changed "Term asked" from "Indirect speech" to "was, would"

Discussion

Denyce Seow (asker) Mar 13, 2006:
@all: Seems that I have understood something wrong in my grammar book. Thanks for your comments.
SirReaL Mar 13, 2006:
"Was" and "would" are 100% correct precisely because this is reported speech. You must "factor in" the tense of the overall sentence into the tenses of direct speech to make it correct.

Responses

+10
6 mins
English term (edited): indirect speech
Selected

It is correct

You would only use "is" and "will" if this were direct speech: Gen. Johnson said: "It is still very difficult..."
Peer comment(s):

agree Anna Quail
5 mins
Thank you.
agree Marina Soldati
6 mins
Thank you.
agree Giulia Barontini
26 mins
Thank you.
agree Walter Landesman
46 mins
Thank you.
agree Oana Apetrei : or if : ...Donald Johnston SAYS that it IS ...
8 hrs
Thank you. Yes.
agree Armorel Young : Simple example: someone saying "I will come" becomes in reported speech "He says he will come" (present) or "He said he would come" (past tense, like your statement).
10 hrs
Thank you.
agree Alison Jenner
10 hrs
Thank you.
agree Isodynamia
12 hrs
Thank you.
agree Romanian Translator (X)
15 hrs
Thank you.
agree Alfa Trans (X)
20 hrs
Thank you.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
+1
6 mins
English term (edited): indirect speech

"was" and "would"

Since this is already finished, there is a clear "past time" element in the sentence. If the conference was still being held (or not yet held) I would recommend using the present tenses, even though it is reported speech.

Peer comment(s):

agree Ingeborg Gowans (X)
1 min
Thank you.
Something went wrong...
+9
5 mins
English term (edited): indirect speech

yes, it is correct as is

that is common usage for reported speech

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 mins (2006-03-13 22:22:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

See also: http://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/reportedspeech.htm

As a rule when you report something someone has said you go back a tense
Peer comment(s):

agree Romanian Translator (X)
3 mins
Thanks, Awana
agree Anna Quail
8 mins
Thanks, F2E
agree Giulia Barontini : Very nice explanation!
28 mins
Thanks, Giulia
agree Walter Landesman
47 mins
Thanks, Walter
agree SirReaL
1 hr
Thanks, Mikhail
agree Refugio : said + was
6 hrs
Thanks, Ruth
agree Oana Apetrei
8 hrs
Thanks, Oana
agree Alison Jenner
10 hrs
Thanks, Alison
agree Yaron Dahan : yep.. reported speech
23 hrs
Thanks, Yaron
Something went wrong...
+2
21 mins

either way

Regardless of what conservative grammar books might say, both forms are used by English speakers in different contexts. The use of "is" and "will" would imply a level of agreement with the speaker's comments that is absent with the "was/would" form.
Peer comment(s):

agree SirReaL
1 hr
agree Rutie Eckdish
2 hrs
neutral Christine Andersen : Very true, but in formal writing I would still go with the 'conservative' tenses used, to preserve the nuances of meaning.
8 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search