French term
à titre indicatif
| 5 +3 | for information/reference purposes |
Vitaliy Rysyuk
|
| 4 +2 | for information/reference purposes |
B D Finch
|
| 4 | indicativelly |
Constantinos Faridis (X)
|
| 3 | for example |
Bashiqa
|
| 3 | for illustrative purposes |
rkillings
|
Apr 18, 2011 12:10: Stéphanie Soudais (X) changed "Field (specific)" from "Construction / Civil Engineering" to "General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters"
Non-PRO (2): Sandra & Kenneth Grossman, Yolanda Broad
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Ukraine
EN, DE, FR, DU, ES, IT
Native in: Ukrainian 
, Russian
Works in: English to Ukrainian, German to Ukrainian, French to Ukrainian, and 29 more.
for information/reference purposes
These releases are made available for information/reference purposes only and do not constitute an offer or invitation to invest.
Medical information is provided for education/information purposes only;
| agree |
bowse123 (X)
2 hrs
|
|
many thanks!
|
|
| agree |
Sandra & Kenneth Grossman
2 hrs
|
|
many thanks!
|
|
| agree |
Victoria Piq (X)
6 hrs
|
|
many thanks!
|
for example
| neutral |
philgoddard
: Yes, it could be this, but we don't have enough context.
4 hrs
|
indicativelly
Indicativelly to get a 50% contrast enhancement in an MR image with the currently ... Viability tests indicate that this labeling procedures can be used to ...
www.wmicmeeting.org/.../P0942B.html
Frost Bolt - Castle Age Wiki
... def-value during attacks (indicativelly 0.7 times the original value) .... View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout). ...
castleage.wikidot.com/forum/t-226274/
report
από H Turković
Actually, there is an indicativelly high proportion of not showing the .... This expressions are used very often without additional modificators - on the ...
bib.irb.hr/datoteka/239180.REPORT.DOC
| neutral |
Evans (X)
: reproducing the many misspellings available on the internet is not terribly helpful.
51 mins
|
|
it is a simple vocabulary matter....
|
for information/reference purposes
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 19 hrs (2011-04-19 07:49:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Now that you have given the context, I would modify the above answer and think that it is saying that the IQI measurement is being used as a rough guide only. So, it is presumably necessary to also use a more precise measurement on a sample of welds to verify that they are OK.
| agree |
Sandra & Kenneth Grossman
2 hrs
|
|
Thanks Sangro
|
|
| agree |
Vitaliy Rysyuk
8 hrs
|
|
Thanks Vitaliy
|
Discussion
La qualité d'image est la suivante:
la densité mesurée sur l'axe du tube emmanché au voisinage immédiat de la soudure doit être supérieure à 3 en simple film,
un IQI à fils est utilisé à titre indicatif,
l’IQI est disposé côté source de rayonnement en travers du tube dans la zone définie par la figure XXX,
Of course I know the standard translation "for info only".
And I don't know how Général / conversation / salutations / correspondance got up there!
Le pronom "your" fait toute la différence - je pense !?!