Jun 22, 2000 15:16
24 yrs ago
12 viewers *
German term
Obsorge
German to English
Law/Patents
I am working on what appears to be a "child custody" decision and am facing 3 puzzling terms that may mean the same thing:
1) *Obsorge* as in:
Die Anträge der Kindoeltern auf übertragung der jeweiligen alleinigen *obsorge* werden zurückgewiesen.
The request of the child's parents to transfer the current sole *custody*? is rejected?
2) *Pflegschaft* as in
*Pflegschaftssache* mj. Tom Montauer
The *custody case* of Tom Montauer?
3) Kindschaftsrecht as in:
Die Entscheidung beruht auf dem *Kindschaftsrecht* in den USA, so daß in wohl verstandenen Kindesintresse spruchgemäß zu entscheiden war.
The decision affect the *child custody legislation* in the USA, so that a decision had be in the interest of the child.
1) *Obsorge* as in:
Die Anträge der Kindoeltern auf übertragung der jeweiligen alleinigen *obsorge* werden zurückgewiesen.
The request of the child's parents to transfer the current sole *custody*? is rejected?
2) *Pflegschaft* as in
*Pflegschaftssache* mj. Tom Montauer
The *custody case* of Tom Montauer?
3) Kindschaftsrecht as in:
Die Entscheidung beruht auf dem *Kindschaftsrecht* in den USA, so daß in wohl verstandenen Kindesintresse spruchgemäß zu entscheiden war.
The decision affect the *child custody legislation* in the USA, so that a decision had be in the interest of the child.
Proposed translations
(English)
0 +1 | See below |
Anya Malhotra
![]() |
0 | You are absolutely correct |
William Scheckel (X)
![]() |
Proposed translations
+1
7 hrs
Selected
See below
I couldn't find Obsorge in any of my legal dictionaries (Dietl, Romain), but it does mean Pflege, sorgende Aufsicht which is custody or care (as in elterliche Sorge = parental custody). So you're fine on that count.
However, it is not current custody but the request of *each* or both the parents for sole custody that is being rejected, meaning that the court probably feels that it is in the best interests of the child not to award sole custody to any one parent.
The definition of Pflegschaft in Dietl is: Pflegschaft is the care entrusted to a curator appointed by the guardianship court to look after particular interests (particularly property interests) of another. The equivalent it gives is curatorship (caretakership would be better here) or trust. However in your case it does seem easiest to refer to it as a custody case unless there are any property aspects involved.
Kindschaftsrecht is (acc. to Dietl) the law of parents and children. That sounds terribly awkward, but I think it goes beyond merely custody legislation.
You could try Child Welfare Law, Family Law or The Law Of Parent-Child Relationships (website references below). Your sentence could be: "The judgement is based on Child Welfare Law in the United States entailing that the child's best interests be taken into account while arriving at a decision" or something like that.
However, it is not current custody but the request of *each* or both the parents for sole custody that is being rejected, meaning that the court probably feels that it is in the best interests of the child not to award sole custody to any one parent.
The definition of Pflegschaft in Dietl is: Pflegschaft is the care entrusted to a curator appointed by the guardianship court to look after particular interests (particularly property interests) of another. The equivalent it gives is curatorship (caretakership would be better here) or trust. However in your case it does seem easiest to refer to it as a custody case unless there are any property aspects involved.
Kindschaftsrecht is (acc. to Dietl) the law of parents and children. That sounds terribly awkward, but I think it goes beyond merely custody legislation.
You could try Child Welfare Law, Family Law or The Law Of Parent-Child Relationships (website references below). Your sentence could be: "The judgement is based on Child Welfare Law in the United States entailing that the child's best interests be taken into account while arriving at a decision" or something like that.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
12 mins
You are absolutely correct
You have already given the best answers to your questions. Wouldn't change a thing. HTH, Will
Something went wrong...