This question was closed without grading. Reason: No acceptable answer
Oct 2, 2013 04:48
10 yrs ago
French term
réaliser en sécurité
French to English
Tech/Engineering
Computers: Software
Railway safety software
This comes up several times in a document describing a train safety software application
Le logiciel de la CCIP démarre à la mise sous tension du bus VME du panier.
Il commence par initialiser les ressources internes des cartes :
programmer le microprocesseur pour la prise en compte de l'interruption vectorisée ITKD,
programmer le compteur de contrôle de l'ITKD,
programmer le composant (UART) gérant la liaison série avec le PEP,
armer le chien de garde logiciel.
Aucun de ces traitements n'est réalisé en sécurité ; toute défaillance risquant de compromettre la sécurité du panier PIP (et donc celle du système) sera détectée et sanctionnée par la carte CKD1, grâce à l'utilisation du monoprocesseur codé.
Le logiciel de la CCIP démarre à la mise sous tension du bus VME du panier.
Il commence par initialiser les ressources internes des cartes :
programmer le microprocesseur pour la prise en compte de l'interruption vectorisée ITKD,
programmer le compteur de contrôle de l'ITKD,
programmer le composant (UART) gérant la liaison série avec le PEP,
armer le chien de garde logiciel.
Aucun de ces traitements n'est réalisé en sécurité ; toute défaillance risquant de compromettre la sécurité du panier PIP (et donc celle du système) sera détectée et sanctionnée par la carte CKD1, grâce à l'utilisation du monoprocesseur codé.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +2 | run in a secure mode |
André Vanasse (X)
|
| 3 +1 | is secure |
Catharine Cellier-Smart
|
| 4 | handle securely |
Marc Quantin
|
| 3 +1 | insecurely |
Greg Irving (X)
|
Proposed translations
+1
7 mins
Catharine Cellier-Smart
Reunion
Reunion
Native in English
Reunion
The Smart Solution
Native in: English (Variant: British)
Works in: French to English, Creoles & Pidgins (French-based Other) to English, English
Related KudoZ points
:
4
is secure
I initially thought of something like "installed securely" or "securely installed", but I don't actually think you need to translate the « réaliser » directly here.
1 hr
Marc Quantin
France
France
Native in French
&
English
Specializes in field
France
French Game & Marketing Specialist
Native in: English 
, French
Works in: English to French, French to English
handle securely
"None of these processes are handled securely..."
Please refer to this article for an example in context (first sentence of third paragraph):
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20070917005028/en/CoWa...
Please refer to this article for an example in context (first sentence of third paragraph):
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20070917005028/en/CoWa...
Peer comment(s):
| neutral |
writeaway
: not so sure your reference corresponds to the context here. In your ref, it's handled by.......
57 mins
|
|
Yes, handled by a piece of software, which is also the case here: "Aucun de ces traitements n'est réalisé en sécurité..." (sous-entendu par le logiciel CCIP mentionné en début de paragraphe).
|
+2
3 hrs
run in a secure mode
The processes are run normally, not in a secure mode.
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Philippa Smith
: I'd say without the "a": "run in secure mode"
2 hrs
|
| agree |
GILLES MEUNIER
1 day 3 hrs
|
+1
5 hrs
insecurely
My view is that there is a double negative here! Quote: 'Aucun de ces traitements n'est réalisé...'
So my quick translation would be:
None of these processes are performed insecurely, any failure that could jeopardize the safety of PIP package (and thus the system) will be detected and handled by the CKD1 card, using uniprocessor code.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs (2013-10-02 10:28:56 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
But I may of course be wrong as 'pas' is ommitted. The text just seems to make more sense this way. Why would each step of a security sytem be run unsecurely?
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 days (2013-10-07 15:42:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I agree that no train safety system would be insecure. That is why I said NONE of these processes are performed insecurely....
In a more free transaltion, one could say: 'Each of these processes is performed under fail safe conditions because any failure that could jeopardize the safety of PIP package (and thus the system) will be detected and handled by the CKD1 card, using uniprocessor code. Hope this is helpful :-)
So my quick translation would be:
None of these processes are performed insecurely, any failure that could jeopardize the safety of PIP package (and thus the system) will be detected and handled by the CKD1 card, using uniprocessor code.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs (2013-10-02 10:28:56 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
But I may of course be wrong as 'pas' is ommitted. The text just seems to make more sense this way. Why would each step of a security sytem be run unsecurely?
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 days (2013-10-07 15:42:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I agree that no train safety system would be insecure. That is why I said NONE of these processes are performed insecurely....
In a more free transaltion, one could say: 'Each of these processes is performed under fail safe conditions because any failure that could jeopardize the safety of PIP package (and thus the system) will be detected and handled by the CKD1 card, using uniprocessor code. Hope this is helpful :-)
Note from asker:
| In this case, I think we're talking more about safety. The system in question is a train safety system. And I think it has more to do with being fail-safe |
Something went wrong...