Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
The British abbreviations for million and billion
English answer:
m and bn
- The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2011-01-31 08:54:10 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Jan 27, 2011 09:02
14 yrs ago
164 viewers *
English term
The British abbreviations for million and billion
English
Other
Other
Which is the correct British abbreviation for million and billion?
1.2bn transactions or 1.2B transactions
1.2m transactions or 1.2M transactions
USD 5m or USD 5M
USD 5bn or USD 5B
I have a feeling that small m is British usage and capital m American, but I haven't been able to find solid proof. Maybe you can help me out?
Thanks in advance! ;-)
1.2bn transactions or 1.2B transactions
1.2m transactions or 1.2M transactions
USD 5m or USD 5M
USD 5bn or USD 5B
I have a feeling that small m is British usage and capital m American, but I haven't been able to find solid proof. Maybe you can help me out?
Thanks in advance! ;-)
Responses
4 +6 | m and bn |
Sarah Bessioud
![]() |
4 +5 | There is no one-size-fits-all rule |
Jennifer Levey
![]() |
Responses
+6
14 mins
Selected
m and bn
The correct abbreviations are bn and m, in small letters.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/style-book/143530...
Abbreviate million to m and billion to bn in headlines.
RELATED ARTICLES
Introduction 10 Jan 2008
In stories concerned mainly with money, company reports and City page references to bids and deals, use m and bn. In news stories as distinct from stories in the business section always write million and billion in full.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/about-us/style-book/143530...
Abbreviate million to m and billion to bn in headlines.
RELATED ARTICLES
Introduction 10 Jan 2008
In stories concerned mainly with money, company reports and City page references to bids and deals, use m and bn. In news stories as distinct from stories in the business section always write million and billion in full.
Note from asker:
Thanks for your answer + link. What I haven't been able to find proof for is the claim that small letters are British usage, capital letters American usage. I have an American colleague who insists that using small letters is incorrect :-) |
Peer comment(s):
agree |
kmtext
6 mins
|
Thanks ;-)
|
|
agree |
Sharon Toh, MITI MCIL
: Yes for British English usage; not sure about American English though.
11 mins
|
Thank you Sharon. Yes, this is British, as per asker's request.
|
|
agree |
Rachel Fell
35 mins
|
Thank you Rachel
|
|
agree |
trsk2000 (X)
: British English, yes!
43 mins
|
Thanks ;-)
|
|
agree |
Rolf Keiser
55 mins
|
Thanks Goldcoater
|
|
agree |
Jack Doughty
: I would leave a space between the number and the abbreviation, i.e. 2 bn, not 2bn.
56 mins
|
Thank you Jack. Funnily enough, my style guide states that there should be no space between the number and the abbreviation. Mediamatrix makes a very valid point;-)
|
|
agree |
Polangmar
2 hrs
|
Thanks Polangmar
|
|
disagree |
Charlesp
: See the discussion
1 day 1 hr
|
Thank you Charles. I'm not sure why you believe this answer is incorrect though.
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you very much, all of your, Jeux de Mots, mediamatrix and peers."
+5
1 hr
There is no one-size-fits-all rule
The English language is unregulated, unlike French and Spanish, for example, which have academies who decide these things and (try to) impose them on an often unwilling population.
Hence, there is no-one to say what abbreviations are are 'correct', except where the prescriptors have full control over the texts as in the example given in Jeux de Mot's answer, or there is some overriding governing body whose prescriptions are imposed by law.
When authoring stuff for my own publications, I never abbreviate million or billion, except when referring to scientific units (where I follow the ISO rules, which have force of law in some areas of human endeavour, e.g. 'M' for mega = million, as distinct from 'm' for milli = thousandths), and in financial texts where my in-house style guide is atuned voluntarily to that of the Telegraph, with the space mentioned by Jack.
Summarising: there is no one-size-fits-all 'correct' solution.
Hence, there is no-one to say what abbreviations are are 'correct', except where the prescriptors have full control over the texts as in the example given in Jeux de Mot's answer, or there is some overriding governing body whose prescriptions are imposed by law.
When authoring stuff for my own publications, I never abbreviate million or billion, except when referring to scientific units (where I follow the ISO rules, which have force of law in some areas of human endeavour, e.g. 'M' for mega = million, as distinct from 'm' for milli = thousandths), and in financial texts where my in-house style guide is atuned voluntarily to that of the Telegraph, with the space mentioned by Jack.
Summarising: there is no one-size-fits-all 'correct' solution.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Polangmar
: The English language is unregulated, unlike... Polish which has language councils and normative dictionaries.
1 hr
|
agree |
Sarah Bessioud
: You make a very valid point mediamatrix. Consistency is the only 'correct' solution, whichever of the recommendations you choose to follow.
2 hrs
|
agree |
Jack Doughty
4 hrs
|
agree |
Sharon Toh, MITI MCIL
15 hrs
|
agree |
Charlesp
: The document has to say Million and then the abbreviation (in paren) -- esp true for Billion - as 'billion' can meen different things in different countries.
23 hrs
|
Discussion