Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

who let the dogs out

English answer:

depending on context:'look at that mess', 'look at that/those ugly woman/women!' (crass and often aggressive)

Added to glossary by Ken Cox
May 7, 2005 19:33
19 yrs ago
8 viewers *
English term

who let the dogs out

English Other Linguistics
What does this saying mean? Cannot seem to find it any dictionary
Change log

May 7, 2005 20:13: Ken Cox changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

PRO (3): Kirill Semenov, Ken Cox, Carolingua

Non-PRO (1): rangepost

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Discussion

Melanie Nassar May 9, 2005:
girl looks beautiful to him. His friends try to tell him how ugly his new girlfriend is, using the exact words "Who let the dogs out?" No matter what the origins of the phrase, it now means "look at those ugly women".
Melanie Nassar May 9, 2005:
Hi Tess, In case you haven't had enough opinions on this, I just have to say there was just a commercial on TV for the film "Shallow Hal". The story line is that a guy is transformed so that he sees the inner beauty of a woman. In other words, an ugly
John Bowden May 8, 2005:
Not to be taken literally - my point is if we all went clubbing we'd see how the song is used *in the real world*!
Java Cafe May 8, 2005:
John: I should get out more? When did this become personal?! Having an opinion on a language question is understandable, but do you really think advising me on my chosen lifestyle is appropriate here?
John Bowden May 8, 2005:
"These allusions to ugly women... where did they come from?" They come from club culture - you should get out more!
Carolingua May 8, 2005:
FYI, I withdrew my answer because I think there is enough controversy, and everyone was disagreeing with me anyway. I wish the asker good luck.
Carolingua May 8, 2005:
My point being that you can't necessarily attribute aggressive behavior with IQ or social class. Maybe I'll rent the movie and watch it with my 4-year old daughter (she loves the Rugrats) :)
Carolingua May 7, 2005:
I agree that these associations are sad. Most unfortunate is that I have witnessed this sort of obnoxious behavior on the part of college men, who were supposed to have a high IQ (I went to Stanford University) and came from very well-to-do families.
Java Cafe May 7, 2005:
The song is played more frequently in day-cares/kindergartens, the audience for whom the song was intended. It's a simple ditty, to which a few societal dregs may have given dark associations. Seemingly, aggressive behavior correlates with low IQ! *Sigh*
Carolingua May 7, 2005:
Java Cafe, I'm sorry if my answer offended you. I tried to be very careful in stating that this is just a "theory". I don't believe that the expression itself, in the context of a children's movie, is "bad" or offensive. It all depends on the context.
Java Cafe May 7, 2005:
John: Have you seen the "video" that has been referred to some of the posts? I apologize I have to disagree with you on this! I really would prefer a stronger term; it is only my respect and regard for the members of this forum that held me back.
Java Cafe May 7, 2005:
Laurel: For a person who is not aware of the facts surrounding the song, the conjecture (hence, term "theory") is understandable. But, when you know the facts, the theory is completely refuted. I tried to be as agreeable as possible. Nothing more.
John Bowden May 7, 2005:
Java Cafe: can we try to avoid using offensive terms like "retard", please? (and don't tell me it's a UK/US thing...)
Laurel Porter (X) May 7, 2005:
As Kim says, we do need more context for this. For example, in the US the song is often played at high school and college athletic events to whip up the crowd - in that context, it has overtones of incitement to combativeness.
Java Cafe May 7, 2005:
Aha, I see! You all chanced upon a "parody video" -- an Internet prank, *completely unrelated to the movie or the original depiction. It;s not even a video, it's a slide show of stills. Even a retard could make something like that. Likely, a retard did!
Java Cafe May 7, 2005:
Carolingua: How do you mean "no one would want to take credit"? They wrote the song, did they not? It's one thing if your *interpretation* is that, but to attribute crassness of that nature to a song from a children's film is an entirely differemt matter!
Java Cafe May 7, 2005:
Please forgive my persistence (and intensity) about this, folks! But, there *is* such a thing as over-analysis! These allusions to ugly women... where did they come from?! I am curious why you think that way.
Kim Metzger May 7, 2005:
If you want a decent solution, you're going to have to help us help you by providing context. In what connection did you see this phrase?

Responses

+7
40 mins
Selected

possible meaning

I agree with Kim that more context is needed, since this is not a 'saying' but instead an expression whose meaning depends on the context.

That being said, if your context is the 'Baha Men' song, after listening to the song and seeing the video clip I'd say that in that specific context it means roughly 'where did all those unattractive women come from?' (my apologies to anyone who may be offended, but I didn't write the song...).

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs 1 min (2005-05-07 22:35:00 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

So maybe I fell for a \'parody video\', but judging from several other answers it didn\'t come from out of the blue. I have no argument with the \'original\' meaning, but one must also recognise how the expression is used in practice.
It\'s not uncommon for expressions (especially catchy phrases) to be adopted for purposes other than their original purpose, with correspondingly altered meanings, and I can\'t see how one can claim that such modified meanings are invalid. Language ultimately means what people understand it to mean.
Finally, I feel a bit sorry for the asker, who (as so often in questions of this sort) seems to have gotten lost in the melee. It would certainly be nice to know the context the asker had in mind. Still, it appears that the answers collectively provide a good indication of the meaning of the epxression.
Peer comment(s):

agree Carolingua : oh my gosh, we had the same thought at the same time!
2 mins
agree RHELLER : yes, very crass reference http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Baha Men
6 mins
disagree Java Cafe : Not really! If you see the movie, you will realize, the song, *if* it can be used metaphorically at all, is saying, "Who is responsible for creating such a mess (causing this much chaos)?" It's endearing story about a few very cute, but very messy kids.
7 mins
Could be. As noted, the meaning depends on the context. I haven't seen the movie, just the video clip. // If the original meaning was 'innocent', whoever made the video clip has a warped sense of humour.
agree Laurel Porter (X) : Java, I'm afraid you're being too literal... The song may have been originally heard in the context of the movie, but NOW in the US the connotation when used in speech refers to ugly women and/or aggressive behavior, thuggishness, etc.
45 mins
Thanks; I hadn't thought of the other connotations. In any case it epresses dislike or disapproval (except when used ironically, and even then it would be on the edge -- but that's getting pretty subtle).
agree jerrie : Used by Victoria Beckham upon sighting Jordan (Katie Price) at an esteemed evening venue somewhere in London .... for me, this is the correct interpretation (UK)!
11 hrs
agree Melanie Nassar : I confess, I never heard the song or saw the movie, but I've heard the phrase a lot, and always with this meaning.
13 hrs
agree John Bowden : Yes, you're right - the use of the song in the Rugrats film simply made it well-known, and has nothing to do with the way it's actually used to attack people!
18 hrs
agree Alfa Trans (X)
20 hrs
agree Kim Metzger
1 day 20 hrs
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Graded automatically based on peer agreement."
+2
9 mins

who allowed a violence to happen?

Who is guilty in the fact that something or someone, which had to be kept at bay, got freedom and caused some unpleasant events?

Dogs have to be kept on the leash so that they didn't harm anyone. So, if they are free, who had freed them?

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2005-05-07 19:43:35 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

This is a rhetorical question or a metaphor, of course.
Peer comment(s):

agree Kim Metzger : Similar to "unleash the dogs of war."
6 mins
yes, this is the allusion which comes to mind first, I think :)
agree Ray Luo : http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=1761534107499&lang=en-U...
11 hrs
Something went wrong...
15 mins

more context required

It probably means who let the dogs escape, i.e. animals that can potentially do damage (e.g. kill sheep), or that you don't want to get lost - see this article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3712960.stm

Also used in this sense metaphorically: Torture, the CIA and the Press
Who Let the Dogs Out? http://www.counterpunch.org/valentine05082004.html


It's also a song: Most Popular Album(s) by This Artist
Who Let the Dogs Out ~ Baha Men (Rate it)
Baha Men - Greatest Movie Hits ~ Baha Men (Rate it)
Move It Like This ~ Baha Men (Rate it) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/artist/glance/-/...
Peer comment(s):

neutral Java Cafe : I hate to be repetitive! But, that article on the CIA is a perfect example of a gratuitous refernce to the lyrics of the song from Rugrats movie! Likewise, hundreds of other articles have failed to resist the temptation.
45 mins
Something went wrong...
+6
12 mins

Lyrics of a song . . .

. . from a Rugrats movie. Sung by "Baha Men."

The lyrics may be found at http://www.lyricsondemand.com/onehitwonders/wholetthedogsout... .


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 16 mins (2005-05-07 19:49:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

This song became ENORMOUSLY popular about three or four years, much like the Bobby Mcferrin song, \"Don\'t Worry, Be Happy\" quite some time earlier, and managed to permeate popular culture.

It is, therefore, commonly referred to -- sometimes even meaninglessly -- in informal spoken or written language, in the USA.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2005-05-07 19:53:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

If you do a Google search on the phrase \"Who let the dogs out?\" most of what you will see are gratuitous refernces to the phrase; attempts to make a piece of writing a little more popular by associating itself with this very popular song.


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 21 mins (2005-05-07 19:54:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The movie in which this song appeared is \"RUGRATS IN PARIS-THE MOVIE.\" More details at http://www.rugratonline.com/rrmovie4.htm .
Peer comment(s):

agree Mónica Belén Colacilli
11 mins
Thank you.
agree rangepost
47 mins
Thank you!
agree Robert Donahue (X) : Wow...craziness. : ) It's a pop song. It was very popular for far too long.
1 hr
Thanks, Robert! I, too, am shaking my head with disbelief.
agree Rania KH
2 hrs
Thank you, Rania!
agree Maria Nicholas (X) : Very very correct.
3 hrs
Many thanks to you, Maria!
agree Saleh Chowdhury, Ph.D.
12 hrs
Thank you!
neutral juvera : I have to disappoint you, "they" didn't write the song, and it wasn't written for the "Rugrats in Paris" movie, And originally it certainly wasn't written for kiddies. And yes, it does mean something. Yours is only half of the story.
13 hrs
Something went wrong...
+2
1 hr

Rezeptionstheorie...

As with so much else, what is called in German the "Rezeption" of a piece of art/literature/music. i.e. the way in which it is "understood" and used by the "consumers" of the work - readers, listeners, theatre-goers etc. - can be very different from what the creator might originally have intended, and the original intention or meaning can become distorted or altered in popular usage, while the author's original intention gets forgotten. I quite agree with the factual origins of the song given by other Answerers - I would just add that, according to my 22-year-old daughter and 21-year-old son, who go to a lot of clubs in Liverpool and Sheffield respectively, in the UK at least the song is sung/chanted by groups of young men at girls they consider to be ugly or unattractive as an insult & macho threat - whenever the song is played at a club, many of the young females leave the dance floor because they don't like the way in which the young men use the song to attack them. This now seems to be he predominant "meaning" and interpretation of the song in UK clubs, however it started out!
Peer comment(s):

neutral Robert Donahue (X) : So YMCA isn't about a cheap place to stay? But there you can have a good meal, you can get yourself clean, you can do whatever you..... Oh, ok, got it now. Thanks. : )
58 mins
If you don't understand the answer, you really shouldn't comment on it.
agree Carolingua : I agree--the way a piece may be interpreted or understood is an important point that should be considered.
1 hr
Thanks - the original question was "what does the phrase mean?", not "What movie did it feature in"!
agree Melanie Nassar : interestingly enough, I just heard this exact phrase used in this way.(see ask asker note)
1 day 19 hrs
Thanks!
Something went wrong...
+4
1 hr

The lyrics are about disrespectful men who hit on women at a party.

Song by Anselm Douglas, a musician from Trinidad

It was written two years before The Baha Men recorded it in 2000.
Various versions were hits in the Caribbean, but The Baha Men toned down the Calypso rhythm to make it more appealing to American listeners.
Desmond Child helped produce this. He is a prolific hitmaker who had worked with many artists. His slick production helped make this accessable to a mainstream audience.

At many American sporting events, this was used after the home team made a big play.
This caused a spat with the Seattle Mariners baseball team. Catcher Joe Oliver was using it as his theme music, but shortstop Alex Rodriguez wanted to use it. Rodriguez got his way because he was the star. The next year, Rodriquez signed a record $252 million contract with the Texas Rangers.
The title became a popular catch phrase in America when it was used in the 2000 World Series between the Mets and Yankees. At one point, an exasperated reporter who was sick of hearing the same questions over and over asked Yankees manager Joe Torre if he knew who let the dogs out.
This is very popular with kids. It was voted best video on the Nickelodeon awards.
This was used in the movie Rugrats In Paris. The deal was made before the song became a hit.
Younger, video-friendly singers were brought in to front the group when it became clear this was a breakout hit for The Baha Men.
The Baha Men performed this live on ESPN's Sportscenter in 2000.
It won the 2000 Grammy for Best Dance Recording.
Peer comment(s):

agree John Bowden : Absolutely! And "disrespectful men" still use it aggressively (see my comment above)
5 mins
Thanks. ;-)
agree airmailrpl : -
1 hr
Thanks.
agree Carolingua : Very informative!
1 hr
Thanks.
agree Carmen Schultz : Very thorough and complete explanation
8 hrs
Thanks.
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search