Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term
est. 2005
• 46 Spinoff in 2011 YTD (Covered Globally, c.50% US)
Hat jemand eine Ahnung, wofür das 'Est. 2005' steht?
4 +13 | established |
Attila Szabo
![]() |
3 +3 | gegründet 2005 |
DERDOKTOR
![]() |
5 | Est. - Established |
Theodore Goumas
![]() |
4 -1 | gegründet in 2005 |
Emily Weidmann
![]() |
Sep 14, 2011 20:13: Steffen Walter changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Sep 14, 2011 23:44: writeaway changed "Field (specific)" from "Finance (general)" to "Business/Commerce (general)"
Sep 23, 2011 14:15: Attila Szabo Created KOG entry
Non-PRO (3): Andrej Fric, Katja Schoone, Steffen Walter
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
established
agree |
Katja Schoone
: Ja, ergo: gegründet
2 mins
|
agree |
Rolf Keiser
: mit Katja
4 mins
|
agree |
Gudrun Wolfrath
8 mins
|
agree |
Ulrike MacKay
10 mins
|
agree |
Carolin Haase
: mit Katja: gegr.
19 mins
|
agree |
Claus Sprick
: mit Katja
19 mins
|
agree |
Oliver Hartmann (X)
20 mins
|
agree |
Horst Huber (X)
: Quite, same as "gegr." or "seit"
22 mins
|
agree |
Andrea Hauer
1 hr
|
agree |
Thomas Pfann
: klaro
1 hr
|
agree |
Andrea Flaßbeck (X)
: ist hier ne Party?
2 hrs
|
agree |
Coqueiro
: da ist ja kaum noch Platz ...
1 day 2 hrs
|
agree |
Dr. Dominik Kozanda
5 days
|
gegründet 2005
agree |
AllegroTrans
14 mins
|
Danke, Allegro !
|
|
agree |
Andrej Fric
: Sicher. Established ist ja englisch. Oder ist das eine Frage: Was bedeutet die Abkürzung? Und das kann auch keine "PRO" Frage sein, mMn.
41 mins
|
Danke, Andrej !
|
|
neutral |
Katja Schoone
: jo, unnötig das noch einzustellen. Habe ich ja schon in meinem agree oben gesagt.
1 hr
|
neutral |
Andrea Flaßbeck (X)
: ja, das war wohl eine Frage nach der Abkürzung, established müsste Monika kennen :)
1 hr
|
agree |
Ruth Wöhlk
3 hrs
|
Danke, Ruth !
|
gegründet in 2005
The company was established in 2005.
disagree |
Katja Schoone
: "in" ist ein Anglizismus, der sich leider eingeschlichen hat, aber deshalb kein bisschen richtiger ist.
3 mins
|
neutral |
Andrea Flaßbeck (X)
: grrr, mit Katja
38 mins
|
Discussion