" A clause is a group of words with a subject and verb",.
" What Is Syntax?
The word “syntax” comes from the Ancient Greek for “coordination” or “ordering together.” In spoken and written language, syntax refers to the set of rules that determines the arrangement of words in a sentence. Along with diction, it is one of the key ways writers convey meaning in a text".

I have put together these two words to possibly make ENG interpretation Syntax Clause to PL szereg składni. It is not a material founded in any source.



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 days 8 hrs (2022-01-22 21:46:46 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

It seems some meanings of conceptual qualification are not clear by a first approach. The particular example of " szereg składniowy" illustrate that.
It can be noticed an inconsistent mechanisms of terms. "Szereg składniowy" does not define plural nature of it
. "Związki składniowe" define some relationship type of the clause.
For the reason of inconsistency I propose the changes to term structure. "Szereg składniowy " to be renamed Wyrażenia Składniowe. ENG interpretation for above could be Syntax Clauses.
Wyrażenia Składniowe would describe the types , for example "łączne" - connective
"rozłączne" - coordinating
" przeciwstawne" - correlative
"wynikowe" - conclusive
" właczne" - inclusive
" wyłączające" - excluding or disconnective
This new name for "Szereg składniowy" proposed as "Wyrażenia składniowe " would better correlate with polish definition. "Związki składniowe " can be renamed and devided in polish language to Złożony typ składni as this would mean " Nadrzędne i Podrzędne" .

Because szereg składniowy express one element, we can see that actually there are more elements of this szereg. At least it could be put szeregi to imply the multitude.
Szereg składniowy as it is resulted in Syntax clause.
Szeregi składniowe gave Syntax Clauses. ( Wyrażenia Składniowe- in my interpretation).

Reading the discussion related to this term, i can see that szeregi are quoted by Mike23 from grammar sources , this is what i have been talking about in my note.

coordinate syntactic structure/construction
---
Coordination (parataxis), subordination (hypotaxis) and predication (interdependence) are traditionally believed to be the main types of syntactic relations (SR). These relations are abstract and do not characterize syntactic functions of elements but mark their mutual status. Therefore opposition of syntactic relations "coordination - subordination - interdependence" may be called "status opposition", since these three types of relations identify the status of elements in reference to each other. The terms "coordination" and "subordination" do not specify elements joined from the point of view of their syntactic function. And the term "predication" delivers the information on relations between two combining elements: subject and predicate. It indicates both the mutual status of the elements and characterizes their syntactic function.

Coordination. Co-ordination is the syntactic relation of independence. In syntax, this type of relation is called paratactic relation, or parataxis (from Greek “to place beside"). Paratactic relation establishes between syntactic components equal in rank and/or status and homogeneous in nature. In Modern English coordinate constructions are defined as those that consist of relatively independent elements joined by means of a coordinating conjunctions and connectives. This type of relations is accomplished by the following forms of connection a) copulative connection:you and me; b)disjunctive connection:you or me; c) adversative connectionstrict but fair; d) causative-consecutive connection (found only on the sentence level): She asked me not to go and I stayed at home. Means of connection used with this type of syntactic relations may be of two types: either syndeton or asyndeton. There are two bases on which paratactic relation is established:conjunctionand adnection.

...
However, traditional view on coordination as a type of syntactic relations presupposing equality of components and mutual independence, which resulted in their positional variation has been changed, since there are cases when components in a coordinate syntactic structures may not change places. Thus, modern syntactic theory distinguishes between symmetric(boys and girls - girls and boys) coordinate constructions, whose elements may mutually change positions, andasymmetric (bread and butter - *butter and bread) ones, where elements occupy strictly fixed positions to each other. Fixed positions in coordinate syntactic constructions may result from several reasons. For instance, in two or three member coordinate set phrases the initial position is usually taken by the element containing fewer syllables: ladies and gentlemen, bed and breakfast, beauty and the beast, beg or borrow, bag and baggage, beg, borrow and scrounge, bacon and eggs, bane and antidote, Oxford and Cambridge, bees and honey, beans and bullets attitude, use and knowledge. However, in the corpus of binary set combinations one may find quite the opposite examples, though they are less numerous: beauty and truth, chicken and egg coffee and (N), collar and tie, collars and cuffs, crabbed age and youth, end or mend, dribs and drabs, doublet and hose, down and dale, December and May, debit and credit. Besides, the requirements to preserve a certain order in enumeration or some ethic considerations may cause to violate the rule: my father and me, my boss and I, Jim, Tom, Roberta and I. Coordinate constructions may also be interpreted as those whose components correlate in the same way with some third item outside the coordinate group. For example, in I was shocked but did not show my embarrassment, the verbs was shocked and did not show maintain the co-ordinate relation, since they both correlate with the word I outside the co-ordinate structure. Similarly, in Father and his friends had dinner in the evening, the nouns father, his friends form a co-ordinate group not because they are joined by the coordinating conjunction and but because they display similar, parallel correlation with the predicate of the sentence had. Means of connection used with syntactic relations of coordination may be four types:prepositions, inflection function wordsand word order.
https://www.lektsiopedia.org/other/lek-7032.html

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days 6 hrs (2022-01-23 19:02:45 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

By definition, a coordinator both syntactically and semantically “links” phrases and clauses of equal status, building coordinate syntactic structures (Greenbaum 1996:156; Biber et al. 1999:79; Huddleston & Pullum 2002:127).
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00754242188178...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 days 6 hrs (2022-01-23 19:26:22 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Można jeszcze rozważyć "sequence" dla "szeregu", widziałem to w jednej rosyjskiej publikacji (coordinate syntactic sequence).