Mar 26, 2012 08:27
12 yrs ago
Czech term
výtka
Czech to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Odvolací soud tu při řešení otázky bezvadnosti návrhu - v rovině zkoumání oprávnění fyzických osob jednat za právnickou osobu - zjevně vycházel z právního názoru založeného na výkladu takové povahy zápisu jednatele společnosti s ručením omezeným do obchodního rejstříku, jenž mu neumožnil přihlédnout k odvolacímu důvodu směřujícímu k **výtce** nedostatku řádného návrhu (§ 205 odst. 2 písm. a/ o.s.ř.)
In dictionaries, I find "reproach" etc. Is there a better way of putting it in this context?
In dictionaries, I find "reproach" etc. Is there a better way of putting it in this context?
Proposed translations
(English)
4 | pointing to the inadequacy of | Jiri Lonsky |
4 +1 | reproof | Hannah Geiger (X) |
4 | alert to an imperfection | Vladimir Havranek, MBA |
3 | the complaint alleging incorrect proposal | Igor Seykora |
Proposed translations
17 hrs
Selected
pointing to the inadequacy of
In the sentence as quoted, the word výtka does not really contribute to meaning in any way. Translation suggestion: ... appelate reason pointing to the inadequacy of the motion
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you. "
13 mins
alert to an imperfection
legalistic wording..
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Petr Kedzior
: Google: No results found for "alert to an imperfection".
14 mins
|
+1
2 hrs
reproof
Number of misdemeanours solved in road traffic 1 374 860 1 483 716
Of which cases solved by fines on the spot 830 132 860 933
Of which cases referred to administrative body 160 704 219 170
Of which cases solved by reproof 384 024 403 613
Fines levied (in CZK)
http://aplikace.mvcr.cz/archiv2008/dokument/2005/report04.pd...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2012-03-26 12:46:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Part of reproof to the way of performance of her function was a circumstance that under her presidency the Supreme Court failed to perform in a corresponding way task entrusted to it as a supreme element of the judicial system (sec. 14 para 1 of the Act. no. 6/2002 Coll.) by sec. 14 para 3 in relation with sec. 21 of the Act no. 6/2002 Coll. (annex 11). These sections
http://www.concourt.cz/tisk/4554
Of which cases solved by fines on the spot 830 132 860 933
Of which cases referred to administrative body 160 704 219 170
Of which cases solved by reproof 384 024 403 613
Fines levied (in CZK)
http://aplikace.mvcr.cz/archiv2008/dokument/2005/report04.pd...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2012-03-26 12:46:54 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Part of reproof to the way of performance of her function was a circumstance that under her presidency the Supreme Court failed to perform in a corresponding way task entrusted to it as a supreme element of the judicial system (sec. 14 para 1 of the Act. no. 6/2002 Coll.) by sec. 14 para 3 in relation with sec. 21 of the Act no. 6/2002 Coll. (annex 11). These sections
http://www.concourt.cz/tisk/4554
3 days 13 hrs
the complaint alleging incorrect proposal
(Eurlex)
Discussion
http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/vr/forms/ComplaintFormPubl...
IMHO - here it would, therefore, not apply at all as we are in stages where further facts are no longer being admitted to courts.
Secondly, the court would not, IMO, be giving "allegations", even if it applied in this case, it is the other party, and I think, again, it would apply to actual charges, which is not the case here.