This question was closed without grading. Reason: Answer found elsewhere
Nov 11, 2010 21:41
13 yrs ago
8 viewers *
English term
security-based swap
English to Spanish
Bus/Financial
Finance (general)
securities
security-based swap market
Proposed translations
(Spanish)
3 | swap sobre índices |
GATrench
![]() |
References
Security-based swap |
GATrench
![]() |
Proposed translations
1 hr
swap sobre índices
En parte pudiera quedar definido por "swap sobre índices", los cuales se pueden definir como:
"Su objetivo consiste en intercmabiar flujos de efectivo sobre el rendimiento dle dinero (LIBOR) por ejemplo, por rendimiento de un mercado bursátil (NASDAQ)" (ver url)
"Su objetivo consiste en intercmabiar flujos de efectivo sobre el rendimiento dle dinero (LIBOR) por ejemplo, por rendimiento de un mercado bursátil (NASDAQ)" (ver url)
Reference comments
17 mins
Reference:
Security-based swap
Por si a alguien se le ocurre la mejor manera de plantearlo, estos se definen como:
"What is a security-based swap?
A “security-based swap” is defined as a swap based on (1) a narrow-based security index, (2) a single security or loan or (3) the occurrence, nonoccurrence or extent of occurrence of an event relating to a sin¬gle issuer of a security or the issuers of securities in a narrow-based security index, if the event directly affects the financial statements, financial condition or financial obligations of the issuer."
"What is a security-based swap?
A “security-based swap” is defined as a swap based on (1) a narrow-based security index, (2) a single security or loan or (3) the occurrence, nonoccurrence or extent of occurrence of an event relating to a sin¬gle issuer of a security or the issuers of securities in a narrow-based security index, if the event directly affects the financial statements, financial condition or financial obligations of the issuer."
Reference:
http://www.mofo.com/files/Uploads/Images/20100608Commodities_and_Derivatives_Reform_Chart.pdf
http://www.pillsburylaw.com/index.cfm?pageid=34&itemid=39753
Something went wrong...