Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

Why does not smth. work?

English answer:

Why does smth. not work?

Added to glossary by Nik-On/Off
Aug 9, 2006 08:38
17 yrs ago
English term

Why does not smth. work?

English Science Science (general) scientific writing
Why does _not_ this mathematical model work at large values...?
Why does this mathematical model _not_ work at large values...?

My concern here is the position of "not." Could you explain which of the two is right and why? (Google backs up both versions.) Thanks in advance

Discussion

Roddy Stegemann Aug 9, 2006:
The integrity of the English language is under siege by artificially created demand for the language. See http://homepage.mac.com/moogoonghwa/earth/current/hklna/ff/d...
Roddy Stegemann Aug 9, 2006:
From Hong Kong I was able to find more than 200,000 hits for the phrasing "Why does not". Unfortunately, I am not at all surprized. This and similar phrasing is commonplace in East Asia, and is likely to worsen throughout the world.
Nik-On/Off (asker) Aug 9, 2006:
nothing, I'm afraid
CMJ_Trans (X) Aug 9, 2006:
so what's new?
Nik-On/Off (asker) Aug 9, 2006:
tons of wrong phrases by Google: http://tinyurl.com/hof7u :(

Responses

+12
6 mins
Selected

the second

The first sentence is incorrect English
The second is correct.

As to justification, English is my mother tongue and I can simply tell you that no self-respecting English person would even think of using the first solution. It would however work in "casual" speech in the form of "Why doesn't...." and there the abbreviated form of 'not' has to be stuck on the verb for obvious reasons. As the first sentence is written, it is however WRONG
HTH
Peer comment(s):

agree Angela Dickson (X) : if Mike says he'd say both of them, I'm not inclined to disagree with him - but the first certainly seems wrong to me, with the work-around as you suggest.
3 mins
agree Konstantin Kisin : Absolutely.
11 mins
agree Michael Powers (PhD) : I stand corrected. CMJ does mention the use of the former as a contraction in her note. All three, CMJ, Angela and Jack reflect usage in this linguistic environment accurately. Mea culpa - Mike :)
12 mins
that's fair - CMJ = she FYI
agree Alison Jenner
23 mins
agree avsie (X)
28 mins
agree Suzan Hamer
40 mins
agree Rachel Nkere-Uwem (X)
1 hr
agree Orla Ryan
2 hrs
agree Tony M : I think in modern usage, it just sounds more natural to keep the negative alongside the main part of the verb when it is used with an auxiliary (similar goes for has/will/could etc.) UNLESS they're too far apart, OR 4 emphasis
2 hrs
agree Alexander Demyanov
4 hrs
agree Alfa Trans (X)
9 hrs
agree NancyLynn : but when the time comes to insert the correct answer into the glossary... you know what to do. ;-)
1 day 16 hrs
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Many thanks to all the answerers and agreers!"
+3
5 mins

Why does this mathematical model _not_ work at large values...?

Если объект между вспомогательным глаголом и частицей - именно так.
Peer comment(s):

agree Suzan Hamer
40 mins
Thanks!
agree Ana L Fazio-Kroll
6 hrs
Thanks!
agree airmailrpl : -
3 days 10 hrs
Thanks!
Something went wrong...
+3
6 mins

why does... not work at large values?

The first one doesn't work with the full words - you have to have the contraction 'why doesn't this model work...'. As to why... I'm not sure. I'll think about it and come back if I find anything.
Peer comment(s):

agree Michael Powers (PhD) : I agree and I was wondering why also. - Mike :)
24 mins
agree Suzan Hamer : Ditto; I think it may be one of those questions which can only be answered "Because."
41 mins
agree airmailrpl : - because it sounds weird !!
3 days 10 hrs
Something went wrong...
+3
8 mins

Why does smth. not work?

In the full form, this sounds better to me.
However, if you abbreviate it:
Why doesn't smth. work?
it is OK.
Peer comment(s):

agree Michael Powers (PhD)
34 mins
Thank you.
agree Suzan Hamer
40 mins
Thank you.
agree airmailrpl : -
3 days 10 hrs
Something went wrong...
+2
45 mins

comment

The 1st one in full form is old fashioned Englsih or may be used in some formal sentences. I wouldn't say it's incorrect Englsih, just not current usage.
I think your examples from the web would be better phrased as, e.g., "Why does Adobe not work...", etc. Nowadays, as has been said, "Why doesn't something work...?" is used (but this is a less formal way of writing) or "Why does something not work...?"

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2006-08-09 09:43:45 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Mr. Dickens : Does my hon. Friend agree that the change in the benefit system ... Why does not the hon. and learned Gentleman point out that unemployment in ...
www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199394/cmhansrd/1994-03...

International companies must invest and develop in an ethical and reasonable way. Secondly, following the point raised by the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Bradford, we should educate the young. I suspect that many of those in that audience that night were young people. Why does not the DfID, through the Department for Education and Employment, bring this problem to our young people? I suspect that the response would be immense.
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld20000...



(from a 19th C novel)
"But, to be sure, what a town Cranford is for kindness! I don't suppose any one has a better dinner than usual cooked but the best part of all comes in a little covered basin for my sister. The poor people will leave their earliest vegetables at our door for her. They speak short and gruff, as if they were ashamed of it: but I am sure it often goes to my heart to see their thoughtfulness." The tears now came back and overflowed; but after a minute or two she began to scold herself, and ended by going away the same cheerful Miss Jessie as ever.

"But why does not this Lord Mauleverer do something for the man who saved his life?" said I.

"Why, you see, unless Captain Brown has some reason for it, he never speaks about being poor;

http://www.projects.ex.ac.uk/trol/grol/gaskell/cran02.htm
Peer comment(s):

agree Peter Shortall : Yes, the 1st way of doing it is old-fashioned
4 hrs
Thank you Peter! It seems to be used quite a lot in UK Parliament and probably in courts, too.
agree airmailrpl : -
3 days 9 hrs
Thank you airmailrpl!
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search