Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Portuguese term or phrase:
Honorários Advocatícios Sucumbenciais
English translation:
attorney fees borne by the defeated party / (awarded) prevailing party attorneys fees
Portuguese term
Honorários Advocatícios Sucumbenciais
Gostaria de saber a melhor tradução para HONORÁRIOS ADVOCATÍCIOS SUCUMBENCIAIS no seguinte contexto:
"II - Reforça esse entendimento, o fato de que, com o advento da EC 45/2004, a competência da Justiça do Trabalho alcança as ações de mera relação de trabalho, donde, além dos honorários advocatícios por inadimplemento obrigacional (material), cabem também os HONORÁRIOS ADVOCATÍCIOS SUCUMBENCIAIS (processual), a teor da IN-{ut3}47/2005 do C. TST."
Notem que há uma distinção entre honorários advocatícios e honorários advocatícios sucumbenciais.
Encontrei a seguinte tradução para essa expressão: DEFEAT FEES, porém gostaria de saber se está correta (fonte: Linguee), ou se vocês têm alguma solução mais adequada.
Desde já agradeço sua valiosíssima ajuda!!
Abs,
| 4 +1 | attorney fees borne by the defeated party |
Mario Freitas
|
| 4 +1 | (awarded) prevailing party attorneys fees |
Charles R. Castleberry
|
| 4 | English rule (attorney's fees) |
Gilmar Fernandes
|
Jan 6, 2017 17:06: Mario Freitas changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/711335">Irene Berlin's</a> old entry - "Honorários Advocatícios Sucumbenciais"" to ""attorney fees borne by the defeated party""
Non-PRO (1): Mario Freitas
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Brazil
32 years engineering/law/contracts
Native in: English (Variant: US) 
, Portuguese (Variant: Brazilian) 
Works in: English to Portuguese, Portuguese to English
attorney fees borne by the defeated party
United States
25 + yrs. Business experience PORT- ENG
Native in: Portuguese , English
Works in: Portuguese to English, English to Portuguese
English rule (attorney's fees)
the English rule (capitalized as English Rule in some jurisdictions) is a rule controlling assessment of attorneys' fees arising out of litigation. The English rule provides that the party who loses in court pays the other party's attorney's fees. The English rule contrasts with the American rule, under which each party is generally responsible to pay its own attorneys' fees, unless a statute or contract provides for that assessment.
United States
Business, Legal & Financial Translation
Native in: English (Variant: US)
Works in: Portuguese to English
(awarded) prevailing party attorneys fees
| agree |
Mario Freitas
: Good alternative, Charles.
1 hr
|
|
Thanks Mario and Feliz Ano Novo! I liked and was studying your reply and this came up as an alternative. Dependendo se Irene quer 6 ou meia duzia, I think she is covered
|
Discussion
...............................
"A República Federativa do Brasil claramente adotou como regra o English rule, com algumas mitigações do American rule quanto a maioria das lides trabalhistas, a maioria dos processos criminais e os de Juizados Especiais de primeira instância."
"A partir da análise dos sistemas ocidental e norte americano, verifica-se que o Brasil adota o sistema ocidental conhecido como English rule, que estabelece consequências econômicas às partes após o encerramento do litígio, enquanto os Estados Unidos da América – EUA, por exemplo, opera sob sistema oposto, conhecido como American rule, segundo o qual cada litigante é responsável pelos seus próprios custos processuais."
Finalmente, English Rule ou British Rule não se aplica quando você está traduzindo um processo julgado no Brasil. Quer dizer que aplicamos a "British Rule" aqui no Brasil??